Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Knowing that jQuery ends up calling those very same functions, only often after jumping through a bunch of hoops, doesnt make me consider it a shortcut. Between auto-complete and copy and paste, I prefer slightly more "work" up front, and then zero needless work at runtime, than a bit of "magic" that ends up doing needless work every single time it is run.

But I have to admit, I don't care about compatibility beyond Firefox on the desktop, if I wrote stuff for a company on a deadline, or if I worked with other people on something, I would mind jQuery very little or not at all. But for my own stuff I make to spark joy, where I get to decide all of it, I want it as vanilla as I can get it.



> copy and paste

Bravo for admitting it. I have to say I've usually run into trouble working with copy and paste coders though.

How do you make sure what you're doing this with is something you understand? I never understood this one.


I just meant copying and pasting long function and variable names out of my own code elsewhere, should autocomplete somehow not apply.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: