Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So? It's a pack of ~90 sites + the main one, content management systems that will probably be used by hundreds, photography.. the cost is not surprising at all.

They could do a better job of graceful degradation for javascript disabled without much effort, but I wouldn't blame them - everyone here seems to support the opposing mindset too.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: