I don't get it, why is Claude still number 1 while the numbers say different, let's see that new Gemini in the terminal also

what a great comment

what a unfortunate name!

in the end we're going to end up with papers written by AI, proofread by AI .....summarized for readers by AI. I think this is just for them to remain relevant and be seen as still pushing something out

You're assuming a world where humans are still needed to read the papers. I'm more worried about a future world where AIs do all of the work of progressing science and humans just become bystanders.

Why are you worried about that world? Is it because you expect science to progress too fast, or too slow?

Too fast. It's already coding too fast for us to follow, and from what I hear, it's doing incredible work in drug discovery. I don't see any barrier to it getting faster and faster, and with proper testing and tooling, getting more and more reliable, until the role that humans play in scientific advancement becomes at best akin to that of managers of sports teams.

shocking

sad

they're suffering from this big time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n2eDcRjSsk&t=2453s

same here

This is the first time I ever receive a point on an HN post...thank you!

launching firefox automatically deletes the distribution folder from Content/Resources; and nothing changed in the browser