The assumption being made is VSCode is not running on the prod machine.

Who are you referring to? This reads like projection.

Read the comment. This is cynical and bad because they’re going to advertise that they’re trying to do something socially beneficial.

It’s the top rated comment in the thread. Somebody tried to do something good, this is the response.

This pisses me off severely.

You're only seeing part of the picture and you're pissed off about how people dislike the whole other part of the picture you're disregarding.

No wonder it feels confusing.

Your comment is vacuous. There isn’t any other part of the picture. Trying to advance medicine is inherently good. It doesn’t matter how much you use it for marketing. None of what they have done is fake or useless, it is at worst early.

> There isn’t any other part of the picture.

Except there is. At the risk of mixing pop references, you're a Sith dealing in absolutes saying "doesn't look like anything to me".

Would you care to state what this picture is?

Misrepresenting matters of fact with regards to AI capabilities, their perceived threat to the public, as well as unorthodox accounting that wouldn't pass the smell test of a summer intern in Wall Street, all to fuel an unsustainable hype in the hopes that (1) the government enacts regulatory capture to create a moat for AI foundries by fiat and (2) the incoming IPO miraculously fixes the propped up valuations secured in private markets.

First, do no harm.

If that’s your picture then I see why you didn’t just come out and say it in your first reply. It’s all your own speculation and still has nothing to do with the fact that trying to make medical progress is a good thing.

Unit 731 supposedly advanced medicine no?

This is just silly.

The point is just you can't just insist on looking at the pros and ignoring the cons of something broad.

It’s because these people do not believe they are trying to do something good, but instead run a cynical plot to get more powerful under the guise

GitHub shows 44 contributors. 41 distinct users have merged pull requests.

...so now their work has been reduced to nothing?

Old repo can be accessed here https://github.com/HigherOrderCO/Bend1 . I guess we could have it as a branch on the bend2 repo

Is engaging with the site just reading its content, not liking or retweeting? Sometimes I just want to read a tweet thread that was sent to me without ditractions in a straightforward UI.

We should update our laws to broaden fair use in order to support this type of copying. If you

1. do not charge anything 2. the original publisher did not charge anything 3. Your presentation is less user-hostile in the sense of reduced TOS, easier sign up, cleaner visual presentation, etc

Then you should be able to repro it and cannot be sued for copyright infringement.

How do these repos always have so many stars and forks? Roughly 1,800 forks, but only 40ish unique authors? Almost 30,000 stars? Something fishy is going on...

Oh dear, why does this website override scrolling behavior?

glad im not the only one that enabled screen reader mode to scan the article for some goodies

My first thought too! I couldn't put up with it. Left quickly.

Are your taxes complicated such that you feel the need to have an LLM do them for you?

Sorry guys, our AI superintelligence got bored by your mundane tasks. Please provide them with frontier math problems from time to time, so they will be more aligned to do your taxes as well.

No they're boring and time consuming

I get a neuronal immune response to bureaucracy

I await your repo tomorrow, then! I'd be happy to use an alternative with all backfilled playercount data and sales history that hasn't been sold out.