I'm always amazed that in cases like this nobody gets crazy and try to get justice themselves.
There are so many guns in the US, and we hear about rogue snipers and school shooters, but never about one guy that decided a CEO should pay for his bad deeds in blood.
Maybe it shows that the average human being is quite stable and peaceful?
Despite our media, it isn't part of our shared culture to go out shoot someone in revenge. Things like murder and generational feuds are taboo. And we're too individualistic to do things like make the ultimate self-sacrifice in pursuit of justice.
We are also very far removed from nature and death. Most of us fear death and do everything to avoid it. Few of us have any experience in killing.
It's easy to get a gun and kill someone in broad daylight. But you have to be really motivated to overcome all that I mentioned and accept the consequences.
To whoever flagged this: grow a spine. The poster is making an observation - and an interesting one. Not even a call to action. Instead of plugging your ears and screaming lalalala, why don't you come up with an equally interesting response to this question that has apparently made you so uncomfortable?
Vigilante justice died down with the phase out of leaded gasoline. One of the effects of people not being so violent and impulsive anymore is that people are not so violent and impulsive anymore
And yet, you still get 'I hate society and I'm going to shoot up a school/mall/movie theatre/parade/nightclub' terracts on the regular.
It is strange that intersection of 'I'm angry at stuff and want to make people pay', and 'I own guns and I'm going to use them' seems to consistently result in rage and violence against society at large, rather than bad actors in particular.
It's almost as if there's a kind of slant to the propaganda that pushes people into those buckets. Not a lot of unhinged, violent anti-3M/Purdue/Kaiser/DuPont rhetoric on the *chans and in the Q-sphere...
Not to mention ads incite to consume more, attempt to creep inside your daily thoughts and lie about the qualities of the product using all the tricks in the books.
Add on top of this it gives more power to the big players with more money and create terrible incentive for the medias and you have one of the easiest moral decision in the world.
The whole industry lost me way back in the 90's when I saw the first popover/under ads for X10 cameras. No, the industry is entirely exploitative of technology with little to no real redeeming qualities and are so invasive, pervasive and dishonest that you generally can't even trust the top search results for product class reviews either.
This is pretty exciting from the perspective of any kind of navigation. If this gets into a phone, we will be able to navigate on a digital map with no signal at all.
Ruff is an excellent base linter because it takes care of essential stuff and has sane default while integrates well without much work.
It's not going to replace pylint, but pylint is hard to configure and slow.
There is overlap between ruff checks and what's eliminated by black though, since ruff implemented flake8 rules first and a lot of them are PEP8 oriented.
Also, note that ruff is also a fast import sorter, faster than isort. But it's not a 1:1 match to isort (no fly to top, some formatting are different).
All in all, I would advice to use it if you are not used to linters, or if you don't feel like going full bazooka on a project.
It's has a very good cost/benefit ratio give how lighweight and easy to use it is.
Ruff actually focuses on checks that don’t overlap with Black. (“By default, Ruff enables Flake8's E and F rules. Ruff supports all rules from the F category, and a subset of the E category, omitting those stylistic rules made obsolete by the use of an autoformatter, like Black.”)
The author says he used all the VR systems that exist under the sun, but he doesn't mention SimulaVR.
Since for my use case it's the most direct competitor (using VR as working tool, not gaming), anybody got a comparison of the early test devices for both?
> The author says he used all the VR systems that exist under the sun, but he doesn't mention SimulaVR.
I don't think SimulaVR counts, since all they have so far is a few prototypes and a single pre-release build sent to an external reviewer (https://simulavr.com/blog/review-unit-in-transit/). And unless the author is that reviewer (or works for SimulaVR), he can't have used it.
And giving either is a good thing, so if this can mean people will give 2 or 3 times a year, everybody wins.