Absurd bureaucracy, and what are you gonna do when it ceases to exist after the paperwork is filed and hte aprts are just funneled back into manufacturing? Making manufacturers bank the schematics and auto-releasing them after manufacture ends is less work for the manufacturer and easier for the market.
Relevant section of the constitution. Don’t know if this would fall under inspection:
> No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
SCOTUS has ruled that, with specific and compelling reasons, states can implement these kinds of interstate restrictions. If Congress wanted to, they could pass a federal law that would pre-empt the state law, but has not done so.
it would also mean that the FedGov would have to evaluate or interact with every sort of intra-state interaction, which would get onerous and expensive quickly.
> FedGov would have to evaluate or interact with every sort of intra-state interaction
I don't think that's the case. It would be up to Congress. They have the authority to pass a law that says: "No state may put up any intra-state barriers to commerce at all", and that would be that.
Or they could choose to pass a law that's a lot more specific, in which case they would need to deal with each intra-state interaction.
It says right there they can do what is needed to execute inspection laws. They just can't charge you to import. California had serious problems with Mediterranean fruit flies destroying crops from the 50s onward, which is why they started doing this.
Yeah, just encountered those on a road trip and wondered how they were legal. Was right on the Cali/Oregon border for a couple of days and those checkpoints were also only sporadicly staffed, so I don't understand the point anyways.
I find it particularly useful for configurations that often have repeated boilerplate, like ansible playbooks or deploying a bunch of "similar-but" services to kubernetes (with https://tanka.dev).
- Seamlessly integrates with any django website, or hold your hand to create one from scratch.
- Play nice with the whole django ecosystem.
- Is easy to pick up because under the hood "it's just django". It uses django models, routing, auth, etc. It's uses standards, best practices, and is a good citizen.
- The blog admin and the provided block editor are good out of the box.
- It still gives you all the flexibility you want: it doesn't force any template on you, any page structure, workflow, nothing. You get to decide how simple or complex you blog is.
We moved away from wagtail and it was a bit of a mess to maintain after using it for a couple of years for our marketing website. I think I'd have stayed with native Django if I had gone back in time. In the meantime the team that manages this switched to next.js instead and it's been the most stable / productive setup so far for our marketing website. This being the 4th tool in 8 years (marketing people change their minds a lot).
Thanks for the comments. Did not know much about wagtail until now. Looks worthy of consideration for a side project I am considering.
If you don't mind answering a couple of questions:
- I have a requirement for basically a CMS with the capability of serious extensibility, built in either python or javascript (I considered ghost but it does meet my requirments). Main job is for a membership based cms but to potentially add functionality outside of standard cms stuff. Would you say wagtail / django combo would meet that requirement? (Sounds like "yes")
- How does wagtail compare to django cms? (Less interested in feature comparisons, more interested in your developer experience with both)
It's very tld dependant. .com and .edu have been there forever, so there are no problems.
But .xyz are usually spammy domains, so they are rejected by default.
My personnal .email address is also often rejected because the tld is quite recent.
The sites I have the most problems with are:
- small shops
- state own ones
- public utilities
Some bugs are not even pure rejection. E.G: my electricity provider, for the longest time, accepted my email when subscribing or using "forget password", but not when login.
On site once tried to autocorrect my email (!), to "fix" the tld.
Oh right, sorry, I hadn’t even thought about other TLDs. I wonder if the rising popularity of .io and .ai domains has shone some light on this issue? Though they are ccTLDs…
They are pretty much the equivalent to the BBC or CNN: a lot of it is alright, but they are still tools for their own gov propaganda.
Because they are different govs, with different agendas, each of them see the propaganda of others as evil, but it's still all very much propaganda.
Remember CNN diffused many bits on how WMD were in Irak to justify the war the UN voted against. The USA went to war anyway, and we learned there were no WMD.
Al Jazeera does the same, but for their side.
It is, nevertheless, quite qualitative content for many topics, and give you another points of on the world events than our own medias outlet.
I am sorry, but they aren't. This is just false equivalence, you can just go read BBC's coverage of UK politics and you will see criticism of their government
