Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more BiteCode_dev's commentslogin

For all its faults, this is one of the things the Python typing system gets right. It's dynamically introspectable at runtime, so you can define type, parsing and validation in one go with stuff like pydantic.


I had one machine on my entire client's network that could never download a LibreOffice document without it being corrupted.

Turns out it was kaspersky intercepting network calls, and deciding it was a very dangerous piece of file, and it would truncate it completely silently.

After wasting a non-billable afternoon on it, I just disabled the antivirus out of desperation and figured it out.

The solution was to generate a self signed certificate and TLS the connection and prevent the bugger to MITM us.

Since this day, even on a local network with behind a proxies and using a VPN, I still use https for all the services if I'm allowed.


Why would they treat it as toxic?

They don't have a moral code, and they don't pay any price for mistakes.

They have zero incentive.


Too bad you can't use the app if you don't have a google account.


Maybe ES' companies gave they a contract stating they assume all the risks and take not a cent unless they succeed, including reparation on failure, just to win the market.


Yep, see also "lies, damn lies, and feedback on arch linux":

https://www.bitecode.dev/p/lies-damn-lies-and-feedback-on-ar...


I read your blog and I can't agree, i've installed arch Linux before and only had to read the arch wiki page on it and it worked fine with none of the issues you described.

Same thing with gentoo, that I am daily driving now.

I sure had hickups but I managed to solve them by sitting and reading the manuals/wikis of the distros directly, or the programs I was dealing with. Maybe the problem is that you read an obscure forum to get your answer? I don't know.


You are exactly the too good to realize all the problems you solve profile from the article.


I think your title is as mature as people using $ in microsoft name in the 9O's. And I'm pretty anti microsoft, don't like google, and hate having AI shoved everywhere.

But this is lazy, and doesn't help debating the technical implications of this blog post.


Yes, espacially exotic tld. I have a ".email" domain name, and I get 2 to 3 instances a year of either rejected forms, or sneakier, just confirmation email that never come until I use a .com address.


I have a 3 character .com as my primary email... it gets rejected more often than I'd like... including at my bank :) I've got a longer more normal domain that I alias, but it annoys me none the less.


Have you got this lot sorted out:

  MX->A->PTR->A->MX
  SPF
  DKIM
  DMARC
  mta-sts - DNS and webpage
Also your IPs must be squeaky bum clean, ideally for several years. DNSSEC might help too. In the UK getting as far as DKIM is usually enough (plus clean IPs, even FTTC connections will work if static).


I refused an interview from google in 2010ish, because it was already dubious with all the tracking and advertising they were doing, as well as the rising censorship.

So if you decided to go in 2017 with all that happened since, your moral compass was already broken with google's. Snowden already revealed what all that data was used for with program like PRISM. You already seen the total lack of interest in preventing scams in their ads as long as it brings money. You've seen the antitrust fines. The tax avoidance schemes. The election influence concerns over youtube content.

What I read is "I know have made enough money from Google immorality, I can virtue signal by taking an early retirement and pretend I'm a great person".


This take I can get behind. Google's leadership has been total garbage for at least 15 years. My experience as an employee of one of Google's closest business partners was that it started going south in 2008-ish and was certifiable by 2010.

These people who act like it's all suddenly gone down hill weren't there or weren't paying attention. If someone believes Goog's only turned to shit since about 2017, they were mislead, probably by the paychecks that kept them from looking too closely.


would you allow that it was bad enough to be fairly labeled garbage in 2011, yet could you still concede it has degraded significantly further since then? Or are you arguing that not only was it bad in 2011, but you are contending it hasn't (also) become worse?


The PRISM stuff about google was mostly BS. The only thing was the non-encrypted traffic on “dark” fiber between data centers. And some may have been a reference to systems to comply with court orders via the DOJ which everyone of any scale does (eg a “wiretap” on a Gmail account).

The military work came out in 2018


Instead of downvoting try responding. Do you not believe me? Do you think the law enforcement access was bad?


The AI voice is annoying, the content is as personal a a vanilla yogurt but the animation is clear.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: