Not to argue for or against Ozempic, but there is a difference between what motivated individuals can achieve on their own, and what one can expect of the general population.
I think your description of linting can be true, but not necessarily for every eslint configuration. I feel that I've landed on configs that feel useful to myself and the rest of the devs in the team. Even with a rule set that contains many rules that can look nit picky at first glance, no one complains since they are auto fixable, and fixing is a part of a commit hook.
There are a handful of rules that are nice to have in a TypeScript project to make sure devs don't do things that break type safety. Plus some that avoids mistakes from slipping through (even though the code is reviewed).
One thing I've found super useful is to have @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment enabled, but configured so that you can still use @ts-expect-error and the others as long as you provide a comment when doing so. This is so nice when doing code reviews, either someone has provided a very good reason for the exception, or it is clear that the same result could have been achieved with a better approach. Same goes for disabling eslint rules inline in a file, also allowed if commented. I feel that this is a very good compromise between being strict with linting, but also not letting linting get in the way.
Yeah there is like one rule that I often try to fix, the “no non-null assertions” rule (some.property!), because it often leads to bugs. I kind of wish you could just disable non-null assertions at the compiler level really. Maybe strict mode should do that.
I can’t think of any other lint rules I find valuable. For the giant mass of node_modules you need to run eslint, I think its cost-benefit is pretty darn terrible.
I don't interpret neither OP nor the first comment this way. What is brought up is the hypocrisy of talking down on any cannabis user while being drunk at work yourself, and positive drug tests that are not related to actual intoxication at work (since cannabis can be detected for a while after coming down).
The 2D ones had soul, they were kinda cringe but there was a wit to the stickers that won you over. 3D ones just look like any other design by committee 3D avatars like Memojis, Samsung's avatars, horrible soulless things with no artistry, look like bad freemium game assets.
I was shocked to find them using bitmojis at all. I find them terribly off putting visually. Not a big deal of course, but until I installed Snapchat I hadn't seen one in years.
I have a feeling that My AI's weird avatar is one of the many variables as to why he was pushed back by users. It is a smug looking character with purple skin. To me, the avatar enters the uncanny valley.
I highly appreciate the effort that goes into this!
The only pity is that I need VMware Fusion and it seems to be broken in the patched Ventura with no fix in sight. Stuck on Catalina for now on my 2012 rMBP.
I would just add some console.log message explaining the issue you have with hotlinking the script. This will not disrupt users, but anyone who fires up their devtools will see that the site is getting shamed. And if their devs care just a little bit, I think they will find it embarrassing enough to host the script themselves.
Correct me if I simply have missed it, but is there an official NPM package available? I have seen https://www.npmjs.com/package/sorttable and perhaps some of the sites would drop the script tag if "npm install --save-dev sorttable.js" is in the instructions and they have a build step for their JS anyway. Just thinking out loud.
I've found that companies where they've done this (hotlinked) often have incompetent or overburdened people, and this shaming wouldn't even register.
Hotlinking code like that though is just plain stupid from the liability perspective. If they are a business, they should be worried about 3rd-party liability.
The fact that they are doing this makes the website hosting the script, a nice juicy target for watering hole/supply chain attacks.
What are they going to do if that happens? Its not like business insurance will cover that.
While there are certainly problematic aspects of dark web markets, society do get some benefits. No physical contact between sellers and buyers, which reduces violence. Reviews of sellers and products makes it significantly easier to purchase safer drugs (for some drugs, adulterants and/or unpredictable potency are a bigger risk than the drug itself). This translates to fewer visits to the ER or morgue.
Edit: My personal opinion is that we should rid ourselves of the demand for dark web markets by regulating drugs. The regulations should focus on harm reduction, both for the users and society as a whole.
>This translates to fewer visits to the ER or morgue.
Yea, you seem confused, the funeral I went to was because my friends brother actually had really easy access to really great heroin. For a long time actually. Surprisingly easy to get delivered…
It was only after he was a full-on junkie estranged from his family after they’d basically given up any wealth they had for rehabs and his theft and violence that the “benefits,” as you call them, of the dark web markets might have mattered in the slightest.
No, no, don’t let me rain on anyone’s parade. Whether it’s heroin, or meth, or who knows? Maybe even sex workers of dubious age and consent! The dark web is just connecting willing customers with quality products.
These arguments seem logical, but are they backed up by anything other than gut feeling? If anything, harmful adulterants in drugs have only increased since dark net markets became a thing. There are lots of reasons for that, but it’s hard to argue DNMs have been a net positive given the statistics on drug abuse over the past decade.
I have ADHD and my flavor makes me look well adjusted on the outside while struggling hard. My mother completely dismissed the possibility of ADHD based on things like me getting a Master's degree. People see the decent grades, but don't see that you put in three times the effort.
Everything got much easier after getting the diagnosis and medication as a 33 year old.
> I have ADHD and my flavor makes me look well adjusted on the outside while struggling hard.
This is me. Looking back at my school days, it is very obvious I had ADHD but neither my parents and I, nor my teachers knew such a thing existed to get diagnosed.
In adulthood, others might think I am doing well, but they don't know the constant struggle my life has.
> but don't see that you put in three times the effort.
This is on point. Sure, I am getting my work done, but they don't see how my constant procrastination, zoning out means it takes me 3x the time to get something done, and it makes me feel 24 hours aren't enough to have my life in order.
I think card companies and the related businesses have too much power. I am a board member of a BDSM club operated by a volunteer organization (we are legally a non-profit). We want to implement card payment on our website for membership and event tickets, but when applying for the service that would be the best option in our country, their payment processor rejects the application citing that they don't allow things like strip clubs, sexually oriented massage parlors, escort agencies or "any sexually-related clubs or services". I get that a BDSM club would easily get caught by this wording, but it's a social arena where our members can hook up and play, and we don't sell any sexual services.
Adding insult to injury, the company behind the service loudly markets that they support Pride every year. The payment processor has pictures on their Facebook of employees attending the Pride parade... We're not a commercial entity, our activities are legal and we also march under the same (rainbow) flag.
Oh, and there is no reasonable appeals process. We initially applied for a different product a while back and got rejected since they had run our web page through Google Translate and determined that we were involved with "public group sex". Asking the service to get is in touch with the payment processor to clear up the misunderstanding was not possible, they just said there was no way to appeal and our best bet would be to contact them ourselves through their website.
This was all going in the right direction of freedom of speech == sexual freedom == censorship free internet.
Then Steve tried to market the appstore as a walled garden and wanted to keep 30% of the revenue so he branded everything as "safe" including no-porn. I don't think this was his intention but it snowballed into this.
I hate crypto with a vengeance but when I hear stories like this I totally get why people are so much into it.
https://www.printables.com/model/1141963-3d-boaty