Why are lists of three considered slop? I genuinely use it quite a bit because groups of three feel more memorable, satisfying, and persuasive. (<- list of three right there)
This seems really cool, and it actually increases intelligence than just speeding up inference. How does it convert latent reasoning into human readable text?
Hmmmm, I'm relatively new to FTC and robotics in general, but I'm kind of excited to see what happens. My team has heard rumors regarding that it will likely be a shooter game this year, which could make it relatively easier for the whole participation body.
He was remarking on how unbelievable it was. He sentence is a little bit hard to parse but he's saying that both 5.5 being better than 5.6 AND Gemini 3.6 scoring better than both are signs that this benchmark is not very useful.
The reason for both of those things is, as you point out, the benchmark is very obviously saturated
I do love some of these examples, but, and as others noticed, they do lack polish.