Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Max345's commentslogin

It's applied to the programming language too - the given source can be compiled to unlimited number of possible machine code representations (it can different just by NOPs).


Yes, definitely. And the same program can run on completely different architectures. But it has a well-defined semantics that must be preserved by the compiler or runtime.

I'm not saying it's all mathematical purity. Programming languages themselves have specs and sometimes they are ambiguous or allow undefined behavior. Compilers have bugs. But the gap between the source code and program behavior is typically extremely thin and language implementations work towards making it airtight.


LLMs are good on things I know little about, but fall short on things I'm good in.


No, they fail all the time.

You just don't notice all the bullshit if you're not already an expert in the field you generate LLM output for.


Hah. Clever.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: