Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | NullifyNAN's commentslogin

LLM performance increases substantially when the exact software you’re writing is already in the training data.

I was thinking the same thing when another PDF library popped up in the .NET subreddit a few hours before this post.

I use coding agents to fill out dunkin donuts surveys for me


Yet it took Codex 8 months to get subagents after their introduction in claude code. This of course pales in comparison to having to symlink CLAUDE.MD to AGENTS.MD


Thank you for old vs new comparison


It seems like you’re so close but yet so far. It’s interesting that you concluded that Claude makes it easier to run tasks locally but did not conclude that claude makes it easier to use the cluster. Feels we’re in need of a part 2 where you use CC to automate all of the mundane cluster work.

Also just a hot tip, if you’re able to keep any always-only PC on a university subnet (your PI should have some form of a server) you can use tailscale as a jump proxy and bypass the whole VPN dance.


> if you’re able to keep any always-only PC on a university subnet (your PI should have some form of a server) you can use tailscale as a jump proxy and bypass the whole VPN dance.

This is an excellent way to have yr. campus infosec ppl shut the network port on said server, and then take the hardware to get its OS install scrutinized, and get your accounts locked in the process.

Don't do this.


Yeah I came to the same conclusion.

Universities use all kinds of hard to setup stuff which are often custom built. Slurm configs, custom configured HPC servers etc. All of this pays off though if you need to do heavy computations which a local machine won't do.

IMO it would be better to make Claude build out something that makes interacting with the HPC much easier. A web UI, Tailscale whatever.


I mean Open OnDemand has been built for that purpose and is deployed in like 2000 locations at this point.

https://www.openondemand.org/


Yeah train wifi is generally terrible. Basically the only real solution is 100% 5G coverage along all train tracks or starlink. This is basically a global issue because line-of-sight for trains is a hard problem.


It's really hard, because anything gets confounded by tunnels unless you have specific repeaters for them, or the train is longer than the tunnel.


OpenAI has answered your prayers.

16 hours ago the readme for codex CLI was updated. Now codex cli supports openai login like claude does, no API credits.

From the readme:

After you run codex select Sign in with ChatGPT. You'll need a Plus, Pro, or Team ChatGPT account, and will get access to our latest models, including gpt-5, at no extra cost to your plan. (Enterprise is coming soon.)

Important: If you've used the Codex CLI before, you'll need to follow these steps to migrate from usage-based billing with your API key:

Update the CLI with codex update and ensure codex --version is greater than 0.13 Ensure that there is no OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable set. (Check that env | grep 'OPENAI_API_KEY' returns empty) Run codex login again


Oh that’s fantastic news, thanks!


You’re not paying for a service, you’re bidding in an open market. They don’t tell you this but it’s the reality.

Drivers can tell if you don’t tip and all of the experienced ones will decline your order.

Though these apps have done a lot of work to conceal the amount the driver actually gets until delivery is completed.


Hm. If it is an open market, the consumer should also be able to decline/filter drivers, that take tips. Maybe it is a market, but sadly not open.


You can already filter out drivers that don't take tips (so, filter to zero) by just not placing the order.


But that filter is at best inaccurate then isnt it? Surely there exists a driver which would accept a tipless delivery, but you cannot find them because all you can do is decline to do business.

Americans need to remove the idea of tipping. It's archaic, because it was originally there for an aristocratic/wealthy patron to show off their status to the lowly servants of an establishment.

Just charge a price, and have it include the full service fee required for providing the service.


If you enter zero tip then you will find drivers who accept that because the rest won't accept.


> You’re not paying for a service, you’re bidding in an open market.

IMHO, this isn't a new phenomenon. Close to 18 years ago, I lived in a city with a popular pizza spot that was about a 10 minute walk away. Normally I'd walk, but having a newborn make that challenging, so I'd get delivery.

Typically, the delivery would take 60+ minutes on a busy night, but after a few consecutive Fridays of a decent tip for the order, the pizza would arrive "burn your fingers" in about 20 minutes.


> bidding in an open market.. they don't tell you... apps done a lot of work to conceal

Markets have prices.

Open markets have transparent pricing for efficient discovery.

Concealed prices in deniable auctions are closer to dark pools than open markets.


Surely most customers would benefit from knowing that they’re bidding for service? Don’t call it a tip, but a bid or priority fee.


You already are able to pay more for 5-20 minutes of "priority".


All that this does is ensure you don't get stacked with another order ahead of you (so the delivery is direct from the restaurant to the person who ordered) in theory.

It doesn't help with situations where drivers are multi-apping (accepting orders across multiple apps and juggling them). The drivers don't even know you have priority.

edit: and in the US where you can definitely see the tip up front, you will almost always find that the order will get picked up quicker if you increase the tip by the equivalent of the priority fee. But you may well get stuck with a delivery before yours.


In my experience, choosing the priority option is nearly a guarantee that I will get a driver who makes extra stops while delivering my order.

It's wild because this happens maybe 10-15% of the time for me when I don't choose priority, but it's around 80% when I do.

I ignore the option now and just bump the tip if I want a chance of better service.


Doesn’t affect anything in my country using the same apps. I’ve always gotten fast delivery, as does everyone I know and nobody tips. Tipping is for yanks.


this feels weird to me because i always thought i already paid for the service as part of my order. having to go into a open, blind bidding war with other customers to gett my order processed ...


With Wolt the rider can’t see tips until after delivery.


... Which they can still use against you


DeepSeek has shown that it makes 500% profit and it sells tokens for far lower than any big AI company.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/chinas-deepseek-claims-th...

These companies are unprofitable because of balance sheet shenanigans. See “Hollywood Accounting”.

There is absolutely no way they are not turning massive profit. They are serving relatively similar models to open source at 5-50x the price.

GLM 2.5 is $0.60 in, $2.20 out and it’s basically equivalent to Claude Opus.

Opus is $15 in and $75 out.

No way they’re operating at a massive loss.


I have no idea about DeepSeek. But the US-based GenAI leaders are in fact, operating under massive loss.


Yeah but most fall apart at lower context than advertised. They do great at simple stuff like needle in a haystack tests but totally flop when you actually try and use that context for something productive.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: