Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _hhkc's commentslogin

There are many organizations like this sprouting up around the city. Businesses and neighbors attempting to collectively do the work that the city departments aren't doing.


They will work on HomePod if you have personal requests enabled on that particular HomePod, which you can do via the Home app.


For me, Siri’s speech recognition is far worse than its NLP


Create separate contacts for each of your parents with their real names. Then, go into your contact card (aka “My Card”) and relate your parent’s contacts, one as mother, the other as father under “related names”. This will let Siri, and the rest of the system, know who your parents are. Also make sure that in Settings -> Siri & Search -> My information, you have the right contact card selected for yourself.


It’s unclear if the parent post meant that they have two contacts named “Mom and Dad” or if they are two separate contacts appropriately named.


It might be unclear for an A.I.

But a human being can use their "theory of mind" and rule out any implausible interpretations of what a fellow human being means when they complain Siri is texting Dad, not Mom, when they say text Mom.


> their "theory of mind"

Yes, I work on that a lot, kinda. It’s tricky, like learning to move one’s ears the first time. When my spouse first brought it up I thought it was “theory of mine” and I kept expecting a name for what it is.


"iOS bug allowed apps to eavesdrop on your conversations with Siri" should be "iOS bug allowed apps to eavesdrop on your interactions with Siri and dictation over bluetooth"


I agree with this. Mostly because I had a poor experience with one of their gate agents recently. They forced me to check my hand luggage because it was 2kg overweight. They don't uniformly enforce the hand luggage weight limit, their employees get to pick and choose passengers at the gate. The gate agent scoffed at me putting an AirTag in the bag that they were making me check.


> They don’t uniformly enforce…

Because it’s a scam. They pick “enforcement” targets by guessing who seems likely to pay.

I’ve never been charged when traveling solo. But with family or co-workers they have a shot at the “oh, just pay it, we have a plane to catch” gambit. I know their tricks and always refuse. Then I lay the bag down and start rifling through it like Yoda in Luke’s lunchbox.

The long line of passengers who think they will miss their flight are staring daggers at me. My travel companions are attempting to activate their invisibility cloaks. I give not one f because it is a scam.

I am helping everyone by showing it is a scam. Half the time the agent backs down. The other times I can usually throw a few heavier things into a spare duffel bag. F that s.


"this bag is too heavy"

OK, I guess I'll...move a few things from there into another bag that is going onto the same flight, possibly the bag of someone I'm traveling with. Now you have reduced the flying weight of the plane by exactly 0 grams and made everyone a few percent more angry / delayed / stressed out.

This is a dumb policy.


It's not just about the weight on the plane. It's about the equipment and people who move the bags around. Clearly, people have some upper limit they need to be expected to lift as baggage handlers.


It was a carry-on bag that was overweight, so nobody other than the passenger would be handling it.


No, it was a checked bag that was barely over the limit. There’s a penalty fee and the bag is tagged “heavy” so the handlers are aware. Some high-mile fliers get an extra weight fee exemption. There’s another limit for max weight.

You can see out the window of the plane the way handlers drag and drop even much lighter bags and crates, even when tagged “fragile”, how much the weight matters and how much they give a s. I have video. The jars survived. Double-boxing ftw.


If we could produce some kind of internal memo or training guide that proved this, would that be enough to result in some consequences in a court of law?


No leaks from Argentina or Venezuela, hm


It's as if they are different countries with different security and networks.


Funny how that works.


Peculiar


You missed it


It's a tax on those that have other transportation options when BART fails


So BART fails, and you decide to leave through the same station. If you just walked through the gates, you get charged ~$7.

But BART failed, so wouldn't there be some instruction? Would you not see the many other people leaving via the emergency gate, which doesn't charge you?

I'm confused on how the same station fare is a tax on people that have other transportation options. I would agree if you said it's a tax on people that accept systems unilaterally.


The problem is that as far as the fare card is concerned you are still "inside" the system until you tap out, so you will not be able to re-enter the system if you leave without tapping out through the emergency gate.


There's no instruction when there is a delay, besides just wait the 30 minutes or pay the tax and get an Uber


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: