Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _ya11's commentslogin

Maybe I'm just old, but I never got the appeal. I find it hard to believe Snapchat has more social value than Twitter, but that's just my opinion.


I must be older still -- I can't believe any of it has value.


Twitter handles 80% of my news consumption somewhat like a "conversational RSS feed." I follow reporters and opinionators I respect and read the links they post to stories.


I never truly understood the quadratic formula until I learned about the history of the equation and its discoverer. History of Mathematics should be a fundamental course.


MD5 hash? Jesus...


His policies seem to change based on who is in the room with him, so I guess it's best to get the right people in that room.


Except that's not how protecting the environment works. You can't undo damage to the environment as easily as you can destroy it. So if in one minute he thinks its ok to do something destructive, in the next minute it will be too late to undo that.

Please keep this in mind.

This applies to other areas of life as well. If you are an undocumented child living in this country. You can't have a normal life if all you know is that Trump might change his mind. You will forever live in fear. That's not fair to anyone.


Oh, I don't disagree.


Which makes his cabinet appointees all the more unsettling.


Agreed.


Because he has an attention span of 5 minutes (according the the ghost writer of his book) We are doomed.


We've had worse, and we've seen worse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Removal_Act

A President Trump very well might be a step backwards, but I'm pretty confident that it will only be a temporary setback.


That it's a "temporary setback" is small consolation to the native Americans.

I'm sure the Holocaust was also just a "temporary setback" too, right?


Godwin's law strikes again.



>We've had worse, and we've seen worse While true, I'd like think things are different now.


[flagged]


A toast to viziers in all ages!


[flagged]


Your "which thing should I give a shit about" decision making process needs some serious calibration.

Side note: Humans subconsciously adjust accents to their audience. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/7931299...


Even if you don't have a degree in your field, college offers an opportunity to enhance your own critical thinking and problem solving abilities, which are paramount to success in some fields.

Also, one has to consider the shifts in education that seem to be focused more on graduation rates than quality graduates. In such a situation, graduate school becomes the new undergrad, and undergrad becomes the new high school degree. This isn't everywhere, but that seems to be the general trend across many markets: a four year degree is become a minimum qualification.


...college offers an opportunity to enhance your own critical thinking and problem solving abilities, which are paramount to success in some fields.

What does this actually mean in concrete terms? I.e., what measurement could I make that would prove this true or false?


My two cents on this.

I have met and interviewed plenty of well educated, degreed individuals that couldn't find their way out of a problem no matter what help you provided them. It doesn't mean these are poorly educated or unintelligent people, just proves that a degree doesn't provided you with critical thinking or problem solving abilities. College only provides you the opportunity to develop these skills, which you can find in other places as well.


Reading Fooled By Randomness / The Black Swan / Anti-fragile would probably put you on a better footing for critical thinking than any college degree. (And probably some other books you could substitute.)


I'm okay with this assessment. College doesn't guarantee these skills, but it certainly provides a great deal of opportunity for the student to gain a significant advantage over non-college grads.


Any psychometric test designed to measure achievement--or explicitly critical thinking--that can be administered pre and post college to an experimental sample. You might have to do factor analysis on the college/setting and/or program studied.


Super idealistic and optimistic, but an interesting thought experiment nonetheless. It's unfortunate that modern economic obsession with "growth" as an eternal endgame is a hard addiction to break.


I think this is why indie magazines are starting to thrive in their niche; even younger readers are appreciating the aesthetic and value of print as a resource AND art form.


At the end of the day attention is the only finite resource. Everything else is infinite. If you have something worthy of my attention, then I might just pay you for it. It has nothing to do with print or infinity. It has everything to do with the value proposition. Mass media has very little value proposition when put against its competitors. Other things might not. Things that you care about that are harder to find. That are easier. That are prettier. That appeal to identity politics like vinyls and other retro things. That make you a hipster or a snob. That differentiate you from the poseurs.


That's my concern with converting my home. Thermostat, lights, security, plugs, etc. Would hate to have to replace it all shortly down the road.


Definitely feels like a variation of Shadowrun.


Except it's inverted. Shadowrun is cyberpunk with orcs and elves. This is orcs and elves with cyberpunk.


I honestly prefer Netrunner. I'd rather keep my fantasy and cyberpunk settings a little separate.


True! I realized that sometime after my comment but neglected to edit


Local team blackouts on streaming services like MLB.tv are the only thing keeping most people (who don't understand proxies and VPNs) from cutting live TV.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: