Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | adamcccc's commentslogin

Airbnb hosts do do some of this stuff - ie. 24/7 checkin is available if you filter for it, as well as other facilities.

But I do agree that it's becoming harder to justify Airbnb use. As it's popularity has risen, it feels like, what was once a cheap stay in someones house, is now the same price as a nice bed & breakfast. And with Hotel's seeing the lost footfall, the gap between a private room in a strangers home and a hotel room with much more privacy has become smaller and smaller.

I've used it every week for about 8 years now for my accommodation when working away but couldn't see using it much in the future


Feel free to checkout our super-realistic type to handwriting generation in greetings cards here: https://wuzci.com/product/we-make-a-great-pear-3/


Eh? The last I heard was the Soundcloud was going bust and letting all it's employees go?

...I'm so out of the loop


It's another modern tech company that hemorrhages money with no return. All they do is lose cash, but they're popular. Compare this to Bandcamp, which has a great UI, no bots, and generates revenue. Yet it's less popular by comparison.

Just take a look at this article from 3 years ago titled "SoundCloud is losing a lot of money — is an acquisition coming soon?": https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/8/14206830/soundcloud-possib...

Get big and cash out


Bandcamp is a great service, but I wouldn't say its a great product. I will get emails saying that an artist released a new album, but when i check my feed it doesn't show up. I have to go to that artist's page directly sometimes. The feed system is buggy, and that's an important part of a music app for discoverability. And the mobile app still doesn't allow me to save offline, last I checked, also important for a music app when streaming on the road.


Hey! Yep, this is definitely something on our roadmap - we're hard at work building better integrations at the moment (Google calendar, facebook etc.) so it's much easier to get all your occasions in.

I'll get a landing page up for people to register their interest for B2B.


I take it, that you've never had to work with html emails then? groans You lucky soul!


Creating HTML emails for Outlook is what I imagine the entire web was like several decades ago.


Not so much as you didn't end up trying stuff only to find it didn't work for some client and you could get away with just targeting Netscape and IE on an 800x600 screen.

My first website in '96 had a repeatable background image with text over the top. That's still problematic in email templates and easiest to avoid.


I have, but I have always used normal html+css?


That works for simple emails, but when you start creating more complex designs tables are an essential tool to ensuring that every element behaves as you would expect:

https://templates.mailchimp.com/getting-started/html-email-b...

Building these types of emails without tables is doable, but you are going to get a lot of inconsistency depending on the device/client/browser.


I had worked on a project in 2010. It was a service that let you pick email stationary, customize it, and had a Outlook add-in and a bookmarklet.

It "worked" in Outlook (2003, 2007, 2010), Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail. And had to display correctly to the recipient in each of those clients.

It was by far the biggest pain in the ass I've ever worked on. Tables weren't enough to make it work outright. Outlook 2007+ couldn't do background images on a table cell, gmail would collapse empty cells, hotmail would remove certain inline styles, and yahoo was actually pretty nice.

The company I worked for took the project on for an equity split + payment plan, we saw a few hundred dollars from it before they went out of business.


We use write everything in Markdown and then convert to a book with Leanpub (http://leanpub.com) Fantastic tool!


I really can't see what this has over Semantic at all - Flex, modular and clean design is just the tip of the iceberg. The only thing is its classes are often pretty verbose and it's almost like learning another language to get it to place nice sometimes.


If they're poor fakes, yes. But if they're like the ones mentioned in this article, there would be no way of telling without bringing a microscope with you.


F1 cars are rear wheel drive and still have to build their torque and power up the rev range and change gears.

Telsa is 4wd and has all it's torque and power from standing with no gears


The F1 engines are already revved up when they start. They just engage the clutch. And F1 gear changes are pretty much instant as the old and new gears are connected at the same time and the moment that would start to cause problems the old one gets disconnected

But yeah its the real wheel drive that stops F1 cars going faster 0 to 60. (limited by the friction instead of the power the engine can deliver)

The whole startup trickery with the two clutch paddles is interesting too. Basically they use one of the paddle to find the bite point and leave it there and then use the other to fully disengage the clutch. Then once the lights go out they drop the other clutch so the clutch goes instantly to the bite point and then use the other paddle to modulate the launch (they are pretty much flatout while standing still and use the clutch to control wheel spin). A launch control computer probably could do this better but such things are banned in F1.


My car has 1092nm of torque from about 1500rpm and it's mind-boggling... 10,000nm is hard to comprehend and surely more than enough to give the occupants some serious whiplash if not sat properly.


Wheels will lose traction, or the front of the car would lift, rather than whiplash.


4000-5000nm is the limit in Formula 1 tech. Just for perspective


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: