Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | avenius's commentslogin

Which was also abused to kill players, dragging them back and forth fast enough to essentially make them incapable of moving :o


I'm amazed to see Tibia show up on HN of all places! And a whole 22 years after I first installed the game on one of our high school computers. This game was the catalyst to my career as an IT professional. I developed a tool back in 2003 or so that calculated experience and skill gains, as my first proper project in Visual Basic. It ended up as a mainstay in the playerbase for a long time, which meant I had to deal with release management and server capacity as a complete greenhorn. Later, when I quit the game, I simply released the codebase on the forums, hoping for some other idealistic soul to take over. Naturally, that went the exact way you'd expect: People embedded keyloggers and released their own version of it, demolishing all the trust I'd built over the years.

Another aspect of this game worth noting: The community, and how the gameplay has changed over the years. In the "olden times", the main focus of the game was the social aspect. There were limited hunting grounds, so people spent their time hanging around and talking, building houses out of boxes and parcels, coming up with games. I recently picked the game back up - now everything feels like it's hyper-optimized for grinding, and that old social aspect feels gone. I find it fascinating - though also a bit sad.


> The community, and how the gameplay has changed over the years. In the "olden times", the main focus of the game was the social aspect. There were limited hunting grounds, so people spent their time hanging around and talking, building houses out of boxes and parcels, coming up with games. I recently picked the game back up - now everything feels like it's hyper-optimized for grinding, and that old social aspect feels gone. I find it fascinating - though also a bit sad.

Seems like a good analogy to human society and the results of late-stage-capitalism.


That’s fascinating, I think I’ve used your software when I was a kid. The one that edited the window title?


Well yeah, it did - I don't remember quite what, but I think it showed the experience rate or something like that. (there was also a hidden feature that showed your login/password in the window title for a short while - I got access to the dll for TibiaGG, which taught me a bit about memory access. This was only done as a prank though, and never for any nefarious purposes)

The software was called Tomes of Knowledge, if that rings any bells :)


I believe it started out as an independent company, but was later taken over by the Dutch government.


IIRC incarceration was a method started by christian monks, and the intention was that the incarcerated would use the time to reflect and contemplate his crimes - a form of rehabilitation. As you say, that certainly isn't what's happening today. Instead it gives criminals a broader network, and my impression is that it works sort of like a "crime school". But the US method of privatizing and profiteering off of imprisonment surely must skew the incentives as well.


The Bible records Joseph as being put in prison in Egypt c.1500 BCE.

Peter is imprisoned in the NT c.30 CE.

Perhaps you meant incarceration with a view to rehabilitation?


Prison in the past wasn't very long term without any slavery - with agricultural scale having people not doing any work wasn't affordable. Hold until the judge gets there or they decide what to do with them unless they are say nobility elite wealthy or otherwise able to justify the expense (ransom or a hostage).

Egypt would be in a good situation for that given seasonality and nile flooding giving better yields.


> The Bible records Joseph as being put in prison in Egypt c.1500 BCE.

Newer evidence strongly suggests the exodus took place during Egypt’s Middle Kingdom (c. 1450), dating Joseph’s deportation and rise to power at roughly 1900 BCE.


Truffles are less potent than mushrooms, so you need to more or less double the dosage. I would think that the 15 grams of truffles then would be equivalent to about 7-8 grams of dried mushrooms. Since it was ingested throughout the day, I would assume that's dosages equivalent to 1-3 grams spread out through the day.


I’ve found it to be closer to 10:1.

15g truffles felt like 1.5g.


> I would think that the 15 grams of truffles then would be equivalent to about 7-8 grams of dried mushrooms

Spread throughout the day that would be reasonable for a facilitated retreat, yes. Also depends on the variety, some strains can be extremely powerful, to the point that 3.5 grams is more than enough.


But we do see the same problem in several European cities. For instance there's been some debate about how nurses can't really afford to live in Oslo anymore due to the discrepancy between income and rent.


And there I think lies the problem. Cities have an economy of scale that rural areas can't match. In my opinion, living in a city should be cheaper. But land is finite and poorly utilized at the benefit of landowners.


I've long thought the same about London. How does a teacher, nurse, or policeman rent anywhere within a 60 minute commute?

Probably many delay having a family and are able to share a house, but eventually that's going to get old for a lot of people.


Europe as a whole has a large mitigating factor in that there is really good public infrastructure buses and trains there. Sure, an hour commute a day isn't preferable but if you can spend it reading or watching netflix it impacts your life a lot less negatively than having to drive a car the whole time.

So no, the baristas, janitors, etc of London can't live in London. But at least most of their commutes aren't as terrible as the majority of US workers driving individual cars over great distances every day to go to work.


It’s possible to rent as a single person or couple within a 1 hour commute, buying or bringing up a family is a very different proposition.


Anecdata, but I'm a typical lurker. If I don't have something to contribute to a discussion, I stay silent. I think that goes for a lot of people. There's also the commitment angle - if you engage in a discussion, you're typically committed to follow up on the responses you get. That can be more of a time/attention commitment than people are interested in, and with the growing toxicity of online discourse a lot of people don't want to put themselves out there to begin with.


There's also your attention surface. I typically read threads/posts from a variety of communities, but might prefer to reply only on some, and lurk on the others. I'm sure this is true for a lot of people, from anecdotes I've heard.


Yep. If it's about programming, game design, board games, video games, writing, I'll feel confident I have something to say and/or want to contribute. But I also read discussion about music composition, hiking, art, diy, history, philosophy, etc, and I would almost never post in those subjects (at least not at this point in time), as those aren't my focus, just other subjects I'm curious about.


Yes, there are few subjects in which I am proficient enough to contribute.


"Commitment" to a discussion is optional. It's perfectly reasonable to give your point of view, and come back a few days later to see if there were any interesting replies.


Depends on the forum. HN emphasises that, by not notifying users that they had replies. Reddit on the other hand colours your mailbox in red so you're aware of replies without actively seeking them.

I don't know which foster the best quality discussions, but I feel the HN way is a bit impersonal.


A trick I finally hit on for Reddit a couple of years ago was that when I start feeling a discussion does not feel fun or interesting anymore, I look away while I click on the inbox icon.

When I don't see the replies, they're easy to ignore.

At some point (I have no idea when), Reddit also added a "disable inbox replies" button to comments, so that you can prevent notifications on a comment by comment basis.


Why is it set up like that on HN?


I have no idea. Perhaps they want to avoid discussions form derailing? Reddit routinely has long sub-threads, but they're hidden behind a link by default.


I agree with your statement. It also adds a lot of bulk, with little substance if everyone chimes in with their own version of a post they agree with.


It still does occur though. A while ago I bought an Asus mini-pc to be used as a media server, only to be stumped by issues with the Realtek drivers. Apparently they're no longer available after kernel version 4.15.

From what you're saying, I guess those devices just aren't that common anymore?


It's about time this became a public discussion. Websites have become so horribly bloated, while most discussions seem to revolve around whether ads are acceptable or not.


Software in general has become bloated. The increases in performance, memory etc in consumer hardware has been offset by the bloat.

Android P uses 10x as much memory as it did from Gingerbread, I don't feel as if there's 10x as many features.


To be fair, ads are the reason websites are bloated. I don't mind websites loading 50 MB if I'm in awe of the amazing multimedia presentation it's giving me. 50 MB of ads just... isn't.


That's not always true. Check out the new GMail, my new corporate account has no ads but it still weighs in at 25MB (well 28MB now - still asyncing stuff!) for the inbox.

In this case, the largest resources are Javascript and CSS (yes 1.2MB CSS files!). The weird thing is that it appears to be making requests with different cache-busting strings and getting resources that are the same size.

(32MB now, I haven't done anything on it since starting this post)


> Check out the new GMail, my new corporate account has no ads but it still weighs in at 25MB (well 28MB now - still asyncing stuff!) for the inbox.

The new gmail is the slowest web app I have ever used. It's gotten so bad I've started managing my email on my relatively snappy inbox iOS client.

It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't load so much crap, like the gchat functionality nobody has used since 2008.


The old HTML only version still works. I just refreshed mine and got 19.11 KB transfered with cache disabled. (about half that with cache)


Sadly I like the bundling of inbox far too much to switch back at this point.


Agreed 100%. Just getting it to load takes forever, and Google Calendar sometimes never renders for me (on latest Chrome for OSX-1).


There's been plenty of public discussion, albeit in the tech community [1]. It's a hard issue to sell to people outside because most people don't care if a website is downloading 1mb or 100mb.

[1] http://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm


Dan Carlin's Hardcore History - Carlin has an amazing way of telling stories, and he goes really in-depth.

Critical Role - A group of people playing Dungeons and Dragons, the episodes are long and always keep me chuckling most of the way through.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: