Maybe it's not an obvious direct connection, but in general good artists seem to get more action than the average person.

> LLMs need to consume more good human-written Ruby code. You might already have seen the problem here.

You might already have _been_ the problem here.

Fixed that typo ;)

I came in expecting the highest voted comment to be that this was some kind of marketing (which I disagree with). I'm glad your comment was what I saw first.

Wouldn’t that mean producing novel work like relativity and QED?

I would maybe argue that Einstein was the most LLM-like of great thinkers.

A lot of his great discoveries were mostly that he was very knowledgeable about the bleeding edge research in a number of disparate areas, and was able to have the aha moment where he could make the connections for how to integrate them.

A lot of other thinkers who created new fields from scratch are probably way harder for an LLM to crack.

That is very aligned with an LLMs ability to have superhuman knowledge in wide areas.

So the (eastward) flight path isn't over populated land. Rapid disassembly and all that.

In this case, southward.

That’s no…oh wait, yes it is.

Also I was surprised to learn that the mass of the Moon is only 1% of Earth mass. I knew surface gravity is one sixth so I guess I sort of assumed that mass would be one sixth.

It's because you have the radius on the denominator (I think)

  def calc_gravity(mass_1: float, mass_2: float, radius: float) -> float:
      G = 6.67408e-11
      return G * mass_1 * mass_2 / radius**2

  earth_mass = 5.972e24
  earth_radius = 6.371e6
  earth_g = calc_gravity(1.0, earth_mass, earth_radius)
  print(f"earth: {earth_g:.2f} m/s^2")

  moon_mass = 7.34767309e22
  moon_radius = 1737.4e3
  moon_g = calc_gravity(1.0, moon_mass, moon_radius)
  print(f"moon: {moon_g:.2f} m/s^2")

  print(f"earth/moon proportion: {(earth_g / moon_g):.2f}")

prints

  earth: 9.82 m/s^2
  moon: 1.62 m/s^2
  earth/moon proportion: 6.04

The premise of the article is that everyone has access to the “same tools” but that’s glossing over the specialization inherent in a specific expert’s harness config (memories, skills, rules, repos, etc) that produce actually helpful responses (eg engineer’s view vs product manager’s view).

Use an MCP proxy.

I refuse to join any meetup where some like me meets the karma requirements.

You mean 1024 right?

You mean 1337 right? You are almost there, just need 20 more.

sounds about right, people with 64 with just drink the (supposedly) free beer and not talk until much later.

relevant: https://xkcd.com/1000/

1k? pfft, I'd go to a 10k karma meetup

Personally, I’d only meet with those in the triple digits of karma.

Does it do flowcharts and arch diagrams? Doesn’t seem like it.