Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bschlenk1's commentslogin

> If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers.

Good. 4.8 is good enough.


After using Fable it's not..


I felt this way about Sonnet 4.5 too, but it would be hard to go back to it now.


I love 4.8 but it's insufficient for the tasks I want to run.

Guess I'll find something else to work on.


What kind of tasks if you don’t mind me asking?!


And while you’re looking at the ingredients the page crashes and refreshes (I like to look at recipes on an iPad), scrolling you back to the top and you have to start over.


All tree shaking is dead code elimination, but not all dead code elimination is tree shaking (in webpack at least).

Tree shaking happens at the import level. If I say `import { abc } from 'some-lib'`, tree shaking won’t include any other objects some-lib may export.

Removing a branch that can never be true, like `if ('production' === 'production') { … } else { /* dead code */ }` is dead code elimination, but webpack wouldn’t consider that tree shaking.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: