Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | calmworm's commentslogin

I’m annoyed by it every time on every site when I have to dismiss it. Probably not the only one and probably depends on your type of site/visitors.

I'm sure some number of website owners ran A/B tests and determined that more people signed in when it was present.

I'm also sure that some number of website owners don't know or care that it's annoying to some people.

Personally I've just learned to ignore it; but if it did annoy me enough I'd zap it with uBlock.


Cursor tends to bounce out of plan mode automatically and just start making changes (while still actually in plan mode). I also have to constantly remind it “YOU ARE IN PLAN MODE, do not write a plan yet, do not edit code”. It tends to write a full-on plan with one initial prompt instead of my preferred method of hashing out a full plan, details, etc… It definitely takes some heavy corralling and manual guardrails but I’ve had some success with it. Just keep very tight reins on your branches and be prepared to blow them away and start over on each one.


That took a decade to resolve? Surprising, but hindsight is 20/20 I guess.


Two. S3 has been around since 2006!



And half or more depending on the platform are foreign agents and/or bots to continue stirring shit up. It’s sadly too easy and the platforms themselves promote that engagement.


The hype to fizzle cycle is shortened with each new dream and approaching zero, which is the true value of the company.


A rose by any other name…


That didn't answer my question.


But it did. Calling something what it is doesn’t matter one way or another. It is still what it is.


No it didn't.


Okay.


This is grade-school level mind games. Is it really that easy?


I'm not convinced that this whole discussion section isn't astroturf... some real out there opinions popping up in here


Late reply, but it’s not about mind games so much as rhetorical artifacts to actuate the levers of power.

When the US issues reports saying the EU is actively working against US values both within the US and globally, that report can be elevated by later US administrations to justify military drawdowns, exiting NATO, etc. The EU should produce counter artifacts demonstrating they do align with US values, but instead they responded as if this was a power struggle.

Your comment about “mind games” suggests too simple an interpretation:

This isn’t about what people believe is true, but what facts are available to the machinery of government policy making — much like litigating semantics and debating evidence inclusion within a court case.

This is about constructing the sentence:

“The EU’s widespread blocking of the freedom.gov free speech platform for the past decade demonstrates a divergence from American values that means NATO no longer functions as an effective vehicle for American vision on the global stage.”


I’m unclear as to what the difference is between my comment and your reply other than a more detailed explanation, which I do appreciate. You’ve just described “mind games”, though.


When did you stop being a child? Can you point to the actual day it happened? Guess what... It didn't happen to anyone else either.


Orwellian quotes are bandied about so much these days… does anything more need to be said?


Embarrassing.


Why does the idea of collecting millions of images of minors not sit right? Roblox, Character.ai, Discord…


Why would minors need to provide photos? The point of this is to verify adult users.


I was speaking of the “face scan” option listed as #1 option on Discord’s “How To Complete Age Assurance”. It’s well known minors are using and/or gaming the face scanning on other platforms. Some adults are even having their accounts downgraded to a minor-level restricted account based on their face scan. All around it’s a terrible implementation for age verification.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: