This is what I'm saying to my kids all the time: don't expect to work for a boss in the future, but count on starting something for yourself. I just don't see most companies hiring loads of people, when they can also summon some robots and agents.
That's some high level expert coffee talk! And it's always fun if they try to outsmart eachother. Are they accurate in your opinion? I know literally nothing about obscure types of coffee :-)
I do know that coffee comes from East Africa / Ethiopia, and that there are many varieties there due to this.
Heirloom varieties tend to be more “wild”. Farmers growing in regions outside of Ethiopia tend to select stable varieties to match the region.
I don’t know about the frost protection from deep canyons, but it makes sense.
I opened a bag of freshly roasted heirloom beans from Jimma, Ethiopia this morning, and they were indeed more tart and fruity than the Colombian variety I had earlier in the week. The discussion tracked with my experience, at least.
Thanks! And thank god my tool passed the 'what year is it' test you tried haha.
I tried Opper now you sent it, and they're both similar AI roundtable tools indeed, but my main goal for Rauno was that the user actually sees what every model says, in real-time. To see every perspective of every AI model, so it actually becomes a lively discussion. But opper definitely has some great points too!
Yeah I agree, in art a lot is driven by context: there's so many paintings or songs that are not outstanding in itself, but the full human context around it makes it significant.
That brings up the idea that art can be "outstanding in itself", aesthetic in a vacuum, disconnected from what people are caring about. That's dubious, but anyway the AI art doesn't attempt that. Instead it has access to a lot of freeze-dried human context which it rehydrates and presents like a fresh meal, so it partially succeeds at providing that significance.
You're right. Maybe I should have said 'painting or songs that do not SEEM outstanding in itself". My point is that an AI 'rehydrating' human context that you mentioned, is (usually) not enough to get the same significance as human-made art.
Another sign that the context and the human factor will always play a huge role in how we experience art. For example, AI generated music can sound perfect, but still we value it less if we don't know anything about the musician's life.
It just proves serious bias and weakness of humans. We really "want" to believe we are special but in the end, you will soon never know if something is made by AI (autonomously or not) and it will trigger the same exact set of emotion as any human would, because in the end it changes nothing, we just want to believe it does (sadly).
"His" companies seem to do better when he's not around. SpaceX has been doing good things while he was distracted with the Cybertruck, then Twitter, then stealing an election, destroying the government agencies that had the audacity to investigate his companies, and now this lawsuit.
