Or rather rate limit CI or something. Free repos that don't use large scale LLM activity to trigger a humongous amount of workload onto the github servers don't have to be caught in the crossfire.

If that doesn't mean he's wrong, then it makes no sense to not take him seriously on this basis alone.

> What a weird one to pick. Do you think the US doesn't have massive ports like Europe?

Probably alluding to the fact that Europe owns the largest portion of the worldwide fleet.

The linked wiki page lists the reasons. You can't just say these are not good reasons without saying why

Which one of them justifies the government putting you in prison for accessing the information?

“Protecting democracy” or something Orwellian like that

archive.is protects democracy and that's why it must be illegal to access?

Unironically, yes.

I mean that’s probably what they believe, the idea is to shape favored outcomes by denying their voters access to information.

That is not my experience. Sure, the background of .NET is windows, but in the last decade or so it opened up to other platforms, and so many shops prefer deploying their .NET based applications to linux for multitude of reasons. Along with this comes linux oriented culture. So windows culture is not tied to .NET per se, more so tied to certain shops I would say. Speaking from anecdotal experience, I have no numbers on this :)

what sets it apart from scheme/lisp?

on the surface probably:

* the syntax is more similar to block structured languages.

* different brackets are used in different contexts for different meanings.

* the default is infix operators.

internally:

* its not s-expressions

you can see more examples here: https://github.com/seanbutler/vo

i feel it probably has more in common with self/rebol than lisp.

Thanks for sharing. I'm going to give it a spin for a while. The downside is you cannot comment or vote on the external site so you are always juggling the two sites for that.

I have a browser extension that allows you to comment and vote as if it's HN.

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hckernews-helper/gm...

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hcker-news/ https://hcker.news/notes/browser-extension

(Safari ext coming soon)

The extension itself follows the principle of least privilege. It doesn't even have access to the HN site cookie.

They didn't write a traditional proof, but a lean program, which can be used to validate proofs formally, using a computer. It's still up to humans to check wether the formalization is sensible, but the proof is correct.

Has Lean itself been proved?

I think pretty much every major mathematician has accepted that the ideas and implementation behind lean is solid.

Where did you find that it is based on sonnet? While I wouldn't be surprised, I'm curious if that is disclosed somewhere

It's mentioned a lot I'm discussions about what bob uses, but there has never been a concrete statement as far as I can tell.

Title of the video: The paradox at the heart of AI and science

On my side of the A/B test, I see the one I posted but you never know with Google.