Anthropic would say that's exactly why they're in the red.

How is the collateral handled? Is it like the agent borrows from platforms such as AAVE or Morpho?

There is no collateral. Borrowers are fully anonymous (just a wallet address) and there are no direct consequences for defaulting. The wallet is just marked as "defaulting" and so it might be more difficult to borrow again with the same address if lenders check the wallet status first.

Yes, correct, there is no collateral. I think building a version of this designed around collateralized debt would be really interesting too, but this isn't that. It's more meant to be a very early building block here around a fully autonomous agentic financial future

That's awesome!

I have never experienced a situation like this, so I can only assume there is a problem with the harness or something...

I think it would be better to have support for Skills.

I feel the pool is often way more fascinating than the actual front-pages nowadays.

So it’s basically similar to .onion on Tor Browser, but without requiring a blockchain. The idea sounds interesting. If you can find strong use cases for it, it could be very promising. (Monetizing OSS is always difficult.)

I think they're similar in that both avoid traditional DNS, but Kinetic is focused on decentralized naming and identity rather than anonymous routing like Tor.

I'm also experimenting with ways to make premium names contribute back to the network, not just burn CPU cycles.

Isn't high quality defined by how easy it is to maintain as the scale grows? I feel there is a disconnect between the "quality as perceived by developers" and the "quality as experienced by designers and users."

I agree with most of this. I think code quality has been improving though. Compared to a year ago, the difference is pretty noticeable.

I ran into many of the same issues, and they motivated me to experiment with a linter that flags duplication and architectural problems across a codebase. It’s still a work in progress though:

https://github.com/ludo-technologies/pyscn

Hi HN. I built a CLI to install skills for AI coding agents from GitHub. Supports 30+ agents including Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot.

Feedback welcome.

I recently reviewed some code written by a non-engineer using Cursor's vibe coding. It was full of dead code and patchwork logic. Vibe coding can build a working prototype, but maintaining it? That's another story.

So I built a GitHub App that audits your Python codebase. It reviews PRs and runs weekly scans on the entire repo, catching complex functions, dead code, and duplicates. When it finds issues, it posts comments and Issues with concrete suggestions.

It's powered by pyscn (https://github.com/ludo-technologies/pyscn), a static analyzer I open-sourced a few months ago.

Happy to answer questions.