Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dthtvwls's commentslogin

Debit and bank transfers are free. Credit cards cost 2.9%


Ah, thanks for the correction!


You are dead wrong. Why do you think capitalist countries have antitrust legislation? Companies can make more money as monopolies. It's a place where most companies aspire to grow to.


You're thinking of an artificial monopoly.


More than possibly those numbers could be from the increased numbers of people who've had to take up part-time work who would've been otherwise unemployed.


There is also the conversion to an information economy with a growth in white collar jobs that are usually salaried with hours no longer being tracked.

Most employers report a normal 40 hours per week on paper, but that is usually the minimum expected.


What degree/uni, may I ask?


Computing and A.I at Sussex - Just about to graduate. Really enjoyed it.


Hold on to this mentality, and you will never develop great software.


The fact is the Chrome efficiently runs many tabs. This guy wants an extreme use case to be primarily supported or the browser must suck.

Supporting it would be a waste of developer time. If they run out of ways to make Chrome faster and have nothing better to do then sure, let's deal with this niche problem.


I don't think Apple is a great analog for most startups, who don't have the time or cash to test and iterate in secret for months. And many of their products that needed real world validation (Ping, Siri) have not turned out great.


I would definitely pay good money (like, $200) for a killer native GUI that administered both Mongo and Redis.


I'm admittedly not too tuned-in with the Mongo/Redis/Couch communities, but I do hear from a lot of folks using my native GUI http client tool to interact with their web APIs. I kind of assumed that most users of them were fairly happy to use low level/command-line tooling - is there a big unmet demand for native GUI tools for things like Mongo, Redis, etc?


What about the quantum superposition of burned and not-burned?


Pseudo-scientific unwarranted conclusion -- the metaphysical implications of QM are not conclusive.


Here's a contradiction for you: Ayn Rand is usually wrong.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: