Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dvaplima's commentslogin

I that is really bad for Brazil, the whole Itaipu deal was better for paraguay since the begining, and now the eletric grid in Brazil will need more energy sources to stabilize and supply its needs. I only see two ways to fix this: Invest in nuclear plants Invest in battery tech

An insightful discussion by @kmiens and the VettoAI Research team

Hahaha, To reach full potential we just need some few billions in funding



I wonder if more companies use web domains as "investments" aswell


There are domain name investment companies, yes. HugeDomains owns over 5 million domains!

As for product companies, like Ramp, buying domains as an investment is generally a terrible idea. Domains are not liquid, the (hypothetical) $5 million that Ramp paid is not a price Ramp could achieve when selling the domain tomorrow. The previous owners owned Router.com for over 20 years before Ramp came along, willing to pay a lot of money for it.

Sometimes a company will buy a domain, use it, shut down whatever it was, then end up with the domain on their balance sheet for years, even decades, before someone tracks them down and offers to buy it. In those cases, the company can make money off the domain, but for every time that happens, there’s thousands more domains on balance sheets that nobody wants to pay a good amount for.

More broadly, domain name investors make their money by buying lots of domains and holding them over the long term, making their money from the very small number that sell. Part of why good domains are so expensive is that 1 sale needs to cover the cost of hundreds of even thousands of other domains that don’t sell.


Domains investors (or squatters, as one may call them) have been around since the beginning of domains.


I think you mean landlords, not squatters. Squatters are the people who occupy owned property without permission, landlords are the people who hold property, do nothing, and collect profit.


In the context of domains, a domain squatter would be more like someone who holds and keeps a domain without any intention of actually using it or taking it knowing someone else might have use of that exact name, they just want to sell it later for more money. In real-life I agree with your definition though, I guess it not 100% comparable, bad name that got stuck.


Digital piracy has little to do with real life piracy and yet the naming stuck too somehow


Domain trolls. Similar to patent trolls that buy patents only to resell or license them.


Thats basically a direct response of OpenRouter by Stripe? ahaha


Thats a good point of view of the traditional Managment consultants, now for the "AI era", this type of interventions will not exist Maybe now the Big coorp will finally get closer to real life solutions to the problems companies face


I wish.

My company is "AI native" in the sense that even though we are not a tech company we are using it heavily to build a bunch of tech that makes us more efficient.

Think building better SaaS products around our actual process rather than whatever bespoke niche SaaS product provides. this has yielded real savings in both software costs and efficiency. Compared to our peers, we are light years ahead. Even the supposed "leading AI readiness consultants" hired by the group board agreed.

our board have still hired kpmg[1] or some other vague merchant to come and help us deliver "efficiencies"

[1] its not them, but I want to keep some level of mystique about where I work


Yeah, in the short term the delivery of "efficiencies" will still be masked, but I think looking into the real potential of AI Agents and Tools It will become harder to hide "fake" solutions, but It can be me just being optmistic


I'm curious to know what they have been providing in suggestions up to now, can you tell us?


Sadly I'm not privy to the internal workings, they are due to report in the new year (got knows how much this is going to cost)

I have a steer that people, process and services are all in scope, but again thats vague-as-a-service™


Maybe GMPK should do a protection racket of sorts. Pay us 1% of revenue and we wont send the consultants j/k


Nope. Everyone has their strengths and should avoid some types of work. AI doesn't change this.

Many consultants and entrepreneurs are too shameless to do that. AI only amplifies their dysfunction.

What most businesses are doing instead is squeezing their middle management to do more with less. No consultants. AI is cheaper. This squeeze happens every time the economy stagnates, and adding AI as "help" is irrelevant.


I agree in the short term the disparity will rise, but looking further I think the efficiency of the AI Agents and the tools specific for each task will shorten the gap between fake and real solutions, But thats me being optmistic for a "good" AGI


Nice, How to use that strategy for software? But first It makes sense?


> preferably contain the letters Å, Ä or Ö

I'm 100% för this.


Hahaha for sure


Nice turn around, does anyone has a benchmark regarding other types of requests (priority vs send twice) other than voice/call? Or the tests already test that?


I liked approach to evaluating AI behavior, the fact that additional reasoning doesn’t improve performance is quite interesting!


That’s a nice discussion. Some people say that with current model capabilities, the real differentiator is the harness. What are the best harnesses you guys are using?


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: