Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | eahman02's commentslogin

I thought this was about the censorship of Gab posts that occurred a few days ago which they ordered.


There's nothing inherently wrong with the Twitter platform.


There was a great article I've never been able to find again about how the UI of Twitter naturally guides users into de facto bullying, and most of the advice given by experienced Twitter users (e.g. check existing replies to a tweet before adding your own) is working around UI choices made by the system itself.


I wonder how many of those bully-inducing UI features are also present in software like Mastodon or Diaspora, and are therefore disasters-in-waiting, to be triggered once critical mass of users is reached.


Was it this one? https://web.archive.org/web/20180801143131/http://www.shamus...

(archive link because the site seems to be down at the moment)


It wasn't, but that's a good article on the same topic. The one I was thinking of was focused more on low-level details of the twitter UI.


Depends on what the goal is.

300 characters incentivizes driveby remarks rather than articulate conversations.

Twitter also has really bad content enforcement. Not inherent to the format, but it's worth consideration in the interest of practicality.


Who has time and energy for articulate conversations over the internet? What do we want, a social network for the few?


Usenet was fun while it lasted. But september will probably never end.


In fact, it's about to start.


I assume the OC versions simply have a bit toggled in the VBIOS?


Probably better binning.


No, you're free to do your own OC. But how much OC your chip will be able to handle is unknown. It's called silicon lottery.


I agree with him. I don't want to imagine my life using an Android. :P


Women don't "wild pee"; I believe these aren't targeted to them.


Women certainly "wild pee", they just hide behind parked cars on parking lots etc. When you gotta go, you gotta go, no matter which tools you were born with.


Those who don't think the way you do are not "aggressively stupid", they just have other interests. That kind of dismissal doesn't help anybody.


Personally I see it as an existential observation rather than a dismissal.

On the whole, the actions of both the voting public in many countries, let alone the politicians that they vote for, do seem to be displaying an increasingly aggressive level of stupidity. Or possibly, if not stupidity, one could more accurately call it apathy.


Think of it the other way: for some people, the public has voted very stupidly for a long time, and now they are starting to get straight.


And yet those people are people whose core beliefs - or at least, the manifestation of those beliefs into policy - are, for the most part, largely objectively wrong.


Or politicians are starting to deliver on their stupid promises.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: