That study is great, but why no UV-C tests? I’ve been using a UV-C decontamination box I made cheaply. It seems safe and effective for a couple of rounds of decontamination.
Was just studying on Far-UVC (222nm) as being much safer than C, yet more effective (literally second(s)) to kill virus..I suspect we will see vast deployments of this light coming to public spaces near you.
Assuming they are using some OoTB software like Cellebrite. It would be interesting to use a vulnerability in one of Cellebrite's file parsers and infect their machine. Would a mass dump of their collected data cause any public outcry?
https://www.nebraskamed.com/sites/default/files/documents/co...