Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | encrypted_bird's commentslogin

Do they have a free tier?

I too prefer reading on AO3 over FFN because AO3 allows me to export stories as epub so I can then read them on my eink reader. :-)

https://fichub.net/ Works well for exporting ff to epub. It works as a bookmarklet too.

Genuine question: why did you out $ signs next to the formula? I normally only see those put next to variable names.

LaTeX uses those to render math formulas. E.g. https://www.openmath.net/latex_reference.html

Some people are so used to it, that they can read in latex


Ah, okay, thanks for explaining! Yeah, I don't know LaTeX. Haha.

You know any decent alternative? I have a Tuta address, but sometimes emails don't arrive.

I’ve been using Fastmail for years now. Easy to use, reliable, and consistent. No major extra features but that’s exactly what I want for an email provider! I see it recommended here sometimes, so I’m happy to be that guy today

Hey thanks I'll check it out!

--- EDIT: Ohhhhhh apparently it's paid-only. Yeah, I would pay for a decent email service, but I'm poor, so I can't afford that... Thanks, anyway!


I would say their point still stands.

Whether the bill was passed is ultimately irrelevant.


Another thing I can't stand is that I swear tooltips have decreased in frequency compared to 10 years ago.

What is an MBP?


MacBook Pro.


Thank you.


How are the blaster bolts different? I'm genuinely surprised I never noticed...


IIRC the original bolts were opaque in the middle and hazy around the edges. It felt like they were blinding even to cameras and visors. New ones were thinner and evenly transparent, as if someone overlaid some cheap translucent plastic


Do you have a source? I'd love to read more. :)


Amateur stargazer's understanding:

Depending what kind of reading material you're looking for (e.g. high level details or mathematically/jargon dense papers) look for things discussing "Rosseland optical depth" and "grey atmosphere approximation".

At a high level, the common convention is to define the radius by finding where the optical depth is 2/3 when using Rosselands clever way of calculating a weighted mean of the opacity from that layer in the star to space across different wavelengths of light. 2/3 being a clever derivation from Eddington where, in an idealized model of a star, that's when the actual temperature of the star should equal its blackbody equivalent temperature.

Pedantically, this distance to the point of equality is an ever so slightly different value than the "distance from the center where there is a 50% chance a photon traveling directly outward will escape the star without another interaction" rule of thumb (in the same idealized grey model). Practically, that the difference is so small is why it's a fantastic rule of thumb explanation.


I'd recommend Carroll & Ostlie's Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, though it requires some basic calculus and physics.


Thanks!


Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, execution for stealing 12 pence worth of stuff? That's crazy! Adjusting for inflation[1][2], that would be the same as nowadays being executed for stealing £5!

[1] According to https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/education/education-resource..., 12 pence (1 shilling, or 1/20 of a pound)) in the old £sd system is equal to 5 pence (or £0.05) in the later decimal system.

[2] According to https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/in..., £0.05 (decimal) in 1832 would be equivalent to £5.02 in 2026 Aug.


When first introduced it was around the price of a sheep. The homicidal version of bracket creep [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracket_creep


Damn, sheep were cheap back then.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: