Is the Brave browser a pseudo-solution to this problem? It can hold a crypto coin balance and either collect more of it through advertisements or pay it out to publishers like news sites.
Its a few years ago, but when i earned something like $1500 in ads each month, brave paid calculated something around $2. I haven't looked into it since.
Skills associated with great leadership have many applications outside of leadership itself. Traits such as high empathy, confidence, creativity, flexibility make great leaders, but also just generally make great people. It would be no surprise the two are correlated!
Honestly as a follower those are commonly praised, but bad signals. You want a leader who is loyal to you and materially and socially supportive of you above almost all else. It's such a mind fuck to work for someone who is empathetic but doesn't stand up for you, or even undermines what you are doing (whether or not deliberately). You can wind up sinking years of your life by being stuck in that situation without even seeing it
Paychecks are the "almost all else" in my assertion, yes. But I think it's wrong to assume that jobs can't or shouldn't provide value beyond remuneration.
Would you still want one if the data showed it was more dangerous than driving yourself around? We don't yet know if it will be, is my point.
I realize that what I wrote above makes it look like I'm saying that no person wants a self-driving car at all. As you point out, that's not true.
What I was trying to say is that, for most people, safety is a bigger consideration than self-driving capability. If a company said "our car drives itself but you're more likely to die in it," I doubt they would sell many.
> Would you still want one if the data showed it was more dangerous than driving yourself around? We don't yet know if it will be
While we might not know yet whether self-driving cars are /already/ safer than human drivers, it is virtually impossible that they won't become much safer very quick. Simply because bugs in software can (and will) be fixed, each car gets an update, and the accident in question won't happen again, ever. Humans, on the other hand, cannot be updated easily, if at all.
This is pure supposition, and not supported by any evidence. We've been fixing bugs in software for decades but we are still finding serious bugs all the time.
215 employess x Avg tech-based salary ( $85,000) = 18, 275, 000 / yr. Add the 6, 000, 000 to awards and grants and the 2, 500, 000 in server hosting (which seems awfully slim) = 26, 775, 000 / yr. Their cash reserves just barely cover a year of operating costs at LAST year's expenses. If they wish to continue expanding their reach year over year, as any well minded business should, their yearly expenses from just these 3 items would most likely eclipse their cash reserves within the one year period. Zero cash reserves would halt all investments, meaning their current state wouldn't cover two years of these three liabilities without donations. So, now what?
Every year we get promises that they'll work on making the banners better.
However, it seems when they say better, they mean more effective from the
perspective of generating revenue. The message from the fundraising staff
and Lila is more of the same.
This year I've started having people I know worry that Wikipedia is in
financial trouble. It makes me feel ashamed when I have to tell them
Wikipedia is in fact fine, but that the foundation uses this messaging to
more effectively drive donations. It makes them angry to hear it.
I'm a bit lazy so I'm going to copy/paste this from a Reddit reply I made earlier this week. But, the story is what I'm very thankful for this year:
I don't have any directly related advice but let me give you some advice anyways. About a year ago I asked this subreddit for help on starting a niche website that would compete with the likes of Etsy, Ebay, Tindie, and Amazon. I was working as a body shop manager at the time and knew absolutely nothing about web development, programming, or anything particularly tech-related. Of course, I got a lot of flack from our fellow redditors. So, after feeling a bit beat down, I tried to take their negative comments as inspiration and began learning as much as I could about web development. Now, just a year later, I'm working as web dev for a large multi-national firm that makes a substantial impact in some major aspects of the web. I'm much happier, living in a new awesome city, and making significantly more money than I was this time last year in result. I haven't realized my original idea that began this journey of mine but, none the less, the dream made a huge difference in my future. So, whatever you do, please, please, PLEASE don't let anyone here degrade your ambition.
TLDR Fuck 'em.
And TLDR - Hacker News Version - Left years spend in a non-tech career, spent a year studying hard and traveling, and now am super happy working as a web developer!
My assumption is if you're at a stage of dev worth running New Relic then your app is probably worth the constant uptime. Out of the dozen or so Heroku apps I have only one or two are using New Relic. The rest are just experiments not worth the additional infrastructure waste.
