Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | esoltys's commentslogin

Why now? From the Govt of BC press release: "The Interpretation Amendment Act, which is the legal framework that enables the Province to adopt permanent DST, became law in 2019. At the time, government chose not to bring it into force in order to co-ordinate timing with neighbouring U.S. states in the same time zone.

Recent actions from the U.S. have shifted how B.C. approaches decisions that merit alignment, including on time zones. Making this change now reflects the current preferences and needs of British Columbians, and helps ensure the province is well-positioned to thrive, even when circumstances across the border evolve."

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2026AG0013-000209


Notably Washington state legislated the same change to DST years ago (instead of standard time, the morons!) but the federal government never approved the switch. AFAIK it's still pending. I remain unclear what authority the federal government has over such a matter and why Washington (or any other) state has opted to respect it. What are they going to do if a state just ignores them and switches their clocks?

Sometimes I get the impression that the spirit of states rights in the US has died.


> I remain unclear what authority the federal government has over such a matter

It's actually an enumerated power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 5:

> [The Congress shall have Power...] To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; ...

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C5-1/...


If US states want to get rid of time switches they are free to go to year-round Standard Time (like Arizona).

You're saying the federal government granted blanket authorization to switch to the one? So the only reason states wait on authorization is merely obtusely insisting on the wrong choice? (In addition to being impotent.) The more I learn about this issue the more things I find to be angry about.

Yes. States are allowed to ignore "summer time" and remain on "standard time" all year round. Arizona is the usual example cited, they do not change the clocks, and remain on standard time year round.

The special auth. from the Fed's is needed to switch to "permanent summer time" (and, possibly advocating for year round "summer time" gives the state politicians cover to do nothing, because "their hands are tied...").


I read elsewhere this may be partial reason why BC forged ahead. As Canada/US relationship is on the rocks and BC stopped waiting for the US to change.

Nailed it. It's been ~5 years, and the odds of coordinating with the US grow smaller by the month.

It is crazy, because there is actually a law that allows us to switch to year round PST if we want (but no one wants that), while we need congressional approval to switch to PDT year round (which is what everyone wants) and the house voted for it, but the senate simply didn't make it a priority.

Nobody wants to switch to west-coast anything at all. Pretty hard to balance a west-coast budget.

Edit: I misspoke. It’s impossible to balance a west coast budget without asking for a bailout from billionaires that have no interest in donating.


In Canada it's $35/yr and I don't see any indication of the 2-week trial that's mentioned on their website. Probably can still cancel within two weeks, but it simply has a Subscribe button before you can do anything.

I like [mistral-nemo](https://ollama.com/library/mistral-nemo) "A state-of-the-art 12B model with 128k context length, built by Mistral AI in collaboration with NVIDIA."


For fun I forked the project to run Llama-3.1 7B or other models using Ollama locally. It doesn't get strawberry right, but it can figure out 0.9 is bigger.

https://github.com/esoltys/o1lama


I made this point on Threads and Nilay's response was "yes making visual lies trivial to make is bad". It's never been photos that made "truth", it's been the source of the photos. You trust a photo from a photojournalist. You don't trust a photo from some rando in your social feed.


>You trust a photo from a photojournalist. You don't trust a photo from some rando in your social feed.

The problem is, this isn't highly true.

Sometimes we don't trust photos from some journalists, not necessarily because we think it is dramatically edited, but we know even professionals have been caught mildly editing, either in-camera or with tools afterward.

Conversely - sure, we don't trust when we see a photo from a rando slandering a politician, unless we want to believe it. At the same time, we mostly believe a rando photo of a fireman rescuing a cat. The latter is less likely to be fake, and if it is, the consequences of believing it are less severe.

Trust heuristics are complex and highly psychological.


"You don't trust a photo from some rando in your social feed."

If only that were true for so many people.


I would add that, at least historically, a reputable photojournalist wouldn't likely build a very successful career on faked photos. It's heavily disincentivized. The time and effort required to build the necessary skills and clout won't casually be wasted by a professional. And if and when it does happen that a photojournalist is caught in a lie, the rest are quick to reject it, because it damages their own reputations and livelihoods.

But now, there's little to stop anyone from producing images depicting anything, and we've seen how systems that are blind to ethics can be manipulated into disseminating such images at a speed and scale that far outpaces fact-checking. Professional standards and traditional gatekeeping have no power against it.


Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2650/


"Snapchat for Web is available to Snapchat+ subscribers now in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada, and Snapchatters across Australia, and New Zealand. We can’t wait to bring it to our entire global community soon."


I'm sure they couldn't wait to... install that geoblock? Sounds logical


I think Snapchat+ is only available in those countries.


When I think of "percentage $ cut off of every subsequent transaction" I think of Artist's Resale Right, or "Droit de suite" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_suite


From the About text: "Set of different things and pipyakas that increase hang time on Twitter." What does "pipyakas" mean?


Pepyaka is a meme from the Russian Internet, meaning "a thing." I've made a similar Chrome extension for a private Russian web community and the description partially migrated here. I’ll fix it.


"I Seem To Recall"


Just as a side note... Nice illustrations by Lonku http://lonku.tumblr.com/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: