Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gelly321's commentslogin

Yep. I used to work for an FQHC, and the only thing that improved our network security was the insurance premiums we'd incur without proving compliance. Ofc course, HIPAA is a thing, but that was simply the baseline.

Are you saying art is anything that makes you feel?

You're confusing a really basic human subject with nonsensical ramblings that that aren't worth entertaining. I think most people would find this dismissive and possibly indicative that you're confused about something beyond your depth.

Can you maybe elaborate about how your communications are on the artistic spectrum?


What paradigm?

You're saying regulatory capture gives you no benefit by just refuting an absolute with 0 context. There's nothing to even debate here. Ok... most people disagree?

Yeah I agree with point 3... Stop engaging in vageries and say something of substance with examples, so people can actually have a conversation with you without us doing all the legwork.


Free speech is not freedom from free speech being used against you. You don't just get to say what you want and everyone else shuts up about it. How absolutely myopic do you have to be to think this way?


Maybe you're just not considering the nuance of the situation. You don't have to take them seriously, but you also don't have to minimize it by misrepresenting words no one said.

Yeah those guys are so not free because they ban CP, a thing you think should be allowed as long as it's not real. Do you see how easy it is to make a bad argument?


You seem to be in agreement, because indeed such “arguments” are be “bad” and yet the Danes have made them law.


> Do you see how easy it is to make a bad argument?

Nope, I just see someone making bullshit excuses.


Do you think child pornography should not be outlawed?


It's not about a winner. This isn't CNN, there's no reason, (if you know better) to use the vibe coded sketchy software like he said. We're better than this. Do you really think popular = automatically better?


> It's not about a winner.

And it is not about being first here. ZuckOff is just a better packaged app, that's why it took off.

> Do you really think popular = automatically better?

If it gets the point effectively across better than the original.

Yes.

It is more supported than something that is OSS that will die in under a year.

There are features that ZuckOff has that are more useful than the suggested one IMO.

For a vibecoded app, it is well packaged with a great name.

That is how you get people to use your app.


I'd rather use software which was made to solve a problem than software that exists to "get" people to use it.


Nearby Glasses has 100k downloads, while ZuckOff is sitting at 1k.


Why use logic when you can use ai pixie dust and marketing and of course our good friend. Bullshit.


popular != better but better == popular

If you see something that is popular but you think it is worse, then your better/worse axis is not aligned with the majority.

For example, X is better than Mastodon because you don't have to pick a server to use.


Untrue for sails, untrue for dinghys, untrue for foils, because price discrimination. I thought it might have been true for catamaran, but I looked it up and it seems that Hobie Cat 16 are still more popular than Nacras for some inimaginable reason, as for once it's not price related.

If I go on another subject I invested time in, RPGs, D&D is the most popular system while inferior imho to a lot of others. Even if we have to keep the very flawed d20 system, the way forgotten chronicles handles everything is superior (and if in your bad opinion it's not the case because weirdly you like the class system, you probably would prefer pathfinder instead of dnd).


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: