Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | greyb's commentslogin

Building solar panel installations in remote locations still requires linking that back to the main grid, and all the in-between infrastructure needed to transform and transmit that power. Building it in an urban location allows you to tap into the existing grid without much added public investment, similar to how some power grids will purchase power from homeowners as an added incentive for doing a home solar install.

Right, they actually have siting advantages over ground mounts for that very reason.

And let's not forget that they are investments, not just stranded costs (it's baffling to see them discussed that way to and down the thread). You get something back for having built them and the barrier to entry is the upfront cost, which is easier to overcome if you're a state spending on infrastructure.


> Building solar panel installations in remote locations still requires linking that back to the main grid, and all the in-between infrastructure needed to transform and transmit that power

Some people actually have an idea of how electricity works and statements like these make them think that the whole renewable energy industry is one big scam.

In your opinion, what percentage of the total cost is involved in tapping into the existing grid from nearest wasteland?


The really critical cost isn't monetary but time. There's plenty of places where the interconnect queue is holding up projects a lot: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2025/05/06/study-...

Same in parts of the UK. Scottish renewables are bottlenecked on transmission to London.

Whereas connecting generation to a substation near demand usually shows up as "negative demand" and doesn't require big upgrades.


The grid connection is very trivial. Connecting panels to the grid is as simple as adding inverter. For example in many places the panels provide electricity to location itself where they are installed.

Meanwhile, there is a whole grey market built around this. People sell “CGNAT mobile proxies” that ride on carrier and ISP NAT, and the whole point is that they are a pain to block without nuking huge ISP ranges. So they get marketed as a convenient way to dodge shadowbans, spam filters, and basically any abuse defense that relies on IP reputation.


> the whole point is that they are a pain to block

What makes them a pain to block? Angry users or some central database that lists these addresses as "do not block"?


> What makes them a pain to block?

Not wanting to cut off access to your users from, for example, every AT&T device (and their MVNOs).


Since cgnat means NATing a huge number of legimate device to a single ip. So angry users is the answer. Also note mobile users are usually the cgnat.


It would be nice if we had a blackout CGNAT day where a bunch of major sites don't serve traffic to people behind CGNAT to give the ISPs a bit of a scare.


This is a win for the consumer though, we don't want to be tracked, your inability for abuse prevention is my ability to stay hidden in the crowd. Why should I care?


Heh, if you think your ISP wouldn't sell port connection timing data to advertisers then you've missed all the history of them selling everything else. CGNAT is not a VPN.


my ISP is bound by my countries privacy regulation, I replace the trust of one party with every website i visit that could be located in fascist regimes without such laws.



Can managers/directors of engineering even qualify for a TN under the recent renewed scrutiny?


Yeah. That's actually the only way to get a TN -- to oversee technical work in a managerial capacity. Technical managers of software engineers are 100% able to enter under TN.


What do you mean it's the only way? Computer engineering is a valid TN employment category, among many others.


Sorry - I mean the "only way" as a manager, not as a software/technical professional.

You can't for example, use manager of a McDonalds to qualify as a manager under a TN as far as I understand it. If you are a manager, you need to be technical in nature.


This remembers of the Youtube channel TRNGL [1]. They got banned from posting for some reason, and their channel was about to be deleted within a few days. They had no following, so they instead looked for bypasses to put a video publicly. They found that while their uploading rights were disabled, they were able to use Creator Studio to record a webcam video begging for help since nobody was hearing their pleas. They have ~200k subscribers too.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/@TRNGL


>This is one of the most magnificent buildings I've seen in my life and everyone should go see it even if you're not religious.

On the flipside, I remember thinking it was a kitsch architectural icon and my family was bullying me into going to visit by dictating my plans while solo traveling.

When I went inside, I had a brief moment where I was struck by awe, and wondered if I should consider converting to Catholicism.


> wondered if I should consider converting to Catholicism

You’re not alone. This is one very conscious motivation for the beauty of Catholic art (not the only motive, but a very real one). Beauty is intelligible and leads the mind upward, toward its ultimate source. Beauty is understood as a transcendental, along with the good, the true, and unity, which is to say, being understood from different perspectives.

In other words, beauty has been an instrument for leading people toward conversion for a long time. There’s even the term “apostolate of beauty” [0].

[0] https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?rec...


It's astoundingly beautiful.


It is possible. It's just not likely either.


Based on what?


Similar happened to me. It's ridiculous to make the claim that a business should be able to make avoidable errors that ruin lives and disrupt societies, and we should pretend that they are worthy of reconsideration without having learned or proven that they've learnt from such a credibility ending cowboy move.


There are many VPNs on TopCashback offering 100%+ cashback. I assumed most of them were trying to build up user numbers in order to sell or get acquired, since I can't logically understand why a VPN would pay so much for an affiliate bonus.


>Unique to the current moment is that there are simultaneously (1) high interest rates and a challenging economy (2) a narrative that AI adoption should enable cutting junior roles.

I'm not disputing your point, but I'm curious: given that the main headline measures that we tend to see about the US economy right now involve the labour market. How do you establish the counterfactual?


When there are downturns in tech, companies squeeze out junior people. This happens often. After 2008 a whole cohort of top talent from software engineering schools were lucky to get lower paying QA jobs and only a few landed software development positions. There were chief economists for banks writing about the underemployed generation (generalized to all white collar) and how they can’t get started or have the same opportunities.

I think we might be seeing this now but headlines get more clicks with AI taking our jobs.


> I think we might be seeing this now but headlines get more clicks with AI taking our jobs.

Note that last time round it took the media a year or so to _notice_; it didn't immediately become clear what was going on.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: