> Translation: my fragile ego is totally dependent on being overpaid for typing instructions I found on stackoverflow
I'm confused. Your comment's shitty tone implies you're overwhelmingly in favor of LLMs. That's copy-pasting not just on steroids, but on crack cocaine. So what point are you trying to make?
If you read carefully I don’t suggest you to base your personality on producing code at all. Whether it comes from SO or Claude, there is no proud in any of these. Let’s be adults and be proud of solved problems and users using our products.
Well, yes. But not here. I don't think he'd go in and troll the real Elizabeth Holmes when he has the chance to do real journalism.
Admittedly seeing him at first made me think "wow that lady sounds exactly like Holmes". Then I realized it was supposed to be her and thought "wow, they did an amazing job casting her".
Then I realized it was her, at which point it was immediately clear this was a serious endeavor and not something Fielder typically does.
I'm just a parrot owner and have no sources for this, but I'd be surprised if they didn't. Birds are very sound-oriented, have to make split second decisions while in the air to avoid collisions and to react to flock calls while they're moving, etc.
At least in parrots, they love playing with sounds. They'll bang things, tap on things, throw things around, and even scream into different objects just to hear the difference. They also have decent object permanence, speaking anecdotally.
Well, it's both. We have all the public facts about Theranos. Nathan Fielder got to live with them for a period of time. That's not public information. It's still a documentary.
Well, she probably watched lots of videos about Holmes and read a lot about her in preparation for her role. IIRC Tina Fey talked a lot about Sarah Palin.
And “the point” is that it is an interesting twist to have an actor who portrayed a public figure actually interact with that figure.
It's not impressive, it's just a fun thing to show people who learned traditionally and never thought to question the commutativity of the syntax (or whether it is commutative at all)
AfD leaders want to bring back the German nationalism of the 30s/40s, fullstop.
Can we please stop pretending this isn't the case? It's so tiring.
reply