This doesn't feel like a real question... Slack free tier is basically crappy Discord, limited message history, no voice channels, huddles are also behind the paying tiers. It is basically worse on all aspects unless you start paying
In your example the src would be the "machine that is behind a NAT". That's the one the peer relay enable access to. And then all your other devices (that laptop) can reach it through the peer relay.
I was also a bit confused on the meaning of src/dst in the grants. The naming didn't match my thinking.
But NIST didn't make that clear. The thing they made clear is in fact the exact opposite and the OP mentions it. They called it SHA-3, saying to the world that this was a better SHA-2. If they wanted to make clear that SHA-3 wasn't to replace SHA-2, they should really have named it something else. Now everybody not knowledgeable to the details will sadly assume the 3 is better than the 2.
Because cloning the dependency is not the issue here. CocoaPods is keeping its index in a git repo that is updated by the user as a way to get the latest index. This is the repo that incur a lot of requests from everyone.
Go get on the other hand doesn't keep any index. It just uses the url to download the dependency because of the mapping "url==project name" that exists with go projects.
It will be exactly the same as 1.5.3 normally since no feature are added in those releases. The key generation problem had no visible impact on the tls negociation, it simply resolved a flaw in the key generation process.
If you can't track the binaries you are running you have a bigger problem than recompiling some of them. Security issues aren't the one in a decade thing, if you can't easily locate which code has to be updated, you are in trouble already...
Well, the specification defines two negociation procedures. You are not forced to support both, you are not even forced to support one, but then how would you make use of it? And you are also free to negociate it another way should you decide to. The spec defines the protocol, not the transport on which it is used or the way the underlying communication is established. They could have put the two negociation methods in another RFC for what it's worth, since they don't affect the inner workings of the protocol itself.
Because this one involve checking duplicates and does a fair amount of logic. When the process is crashing, all bets are off and you may not be able to allocate memory for this processing. This is why they simply dump all there is to stderr and exit.
They are doing it. If you have a slow connection and the video start to buffer a lot, there is a banner that appear right under the video linking to the video quality report. I saw it yesterday
Good. We need to Name-n-Shame these ISP's into doing good by their customers.
There was an interesting interview with Comcast CEO the other day where he said, "[We] don’t wake up everyday and go to work and say we want to be hated.”
But then he attempted to shift the blame to content providers:
"Roberts followed up this statement by saying that Comcast is mostly hated because 'it’s the company consumers have to deal with when other companies raise their prices.'"
They generally offer better pricing for faster speeds with less BS, ie no monitoring, ad injections, throttling, etc.
You will have to look for ones in your area, but they are there. Usually each major city will have a few. Rural areas will tend to have more WISP's (wireless isp's) that are also small and all about their customers.
The recourse is to call your Senator and Congressman and demand they force big ISP's to lease fiber/copper to smaller companies, much like phone-line providers are required to lease their copper to other companies. This will help spur competition, which means everyone wins.
I don't know what you mean by "major city," but I look in Milwaukee every six months or so. There simply aren't any "independent ISPs" here with remotely comparable speeds or prices.
Hi! I'm one of the four (that I know of) independent ISPs that serve Milwaukee and the surrounding areas with a combination of WISP, Fiber, and Copper technologies. We all suck at advertising and rely on referrals.
In the Milwaukee market we all focus on business users (and generally ones that need symmetric or high-upload service and would be looking at a fiber build) or MDU applications because... For the past several years we've seen a consumer preference for absolute lowest cost over quality or available bandwidth. At the extreme end we still have users on wholesaled ILEC DSL on provisioned for 768k download that just don't care enough to upgrade or switch because they like the sub $20 price. It's ILEC controlled so I can't just upgrade them out of the goodness of my heart either.
The participants list for our little Internet Exchange is somewhat workable as a directory of area independent ISPs although some of us are datacenter operators or as far away as Racine or Madison: http://www.mkeix.net/
This is my experience as well, just across the pond from you (West Michigan).
Home users demand the world for $19.99 a month and no contract. Therefore, they get terrible Comcast / TWC / ATT (essentially, they get what they asked for).
There are a lot of people trying to run the "independent ISP" gauntlet, all over the US. (And I'm biased, as I am one of them). But those consumer prices usually only work if you offer bad/slow service, have a complete monopoly, or have government subsidy.
Since most Independents don't have or won't do most of those, they have to focus on business, as those are (usually) the only people who care enough to put actual money into service.
I haven't been in the access game for a long time, but I honestly don't know how you could sell to even smart "prosumers" these days.
I would love to get a ~50mbps line to my home, from a reliable local ISP with clue. I'd pay around $150/mo for such service, and I'm not one of those guys that runs stuff maxed out 24x7.
There just are no options where I live for that amount of bandwidth other than Comcast. So instead I have my primary comcast line ($120/mo) which is 150/20, and a backup DSL line from USWest/Qwest/Centurylink/whatever they are calling themselves today. I believe that one is 20/2, but it sucks so bad (seriously no 1500 MTU still? sigh.) I rarely use it even for failover anymore. LTE is faster.
There are a two main reasons that I see, technical and business.
Generally speaking, multipoint access technologies (including cell & fixed wireless/wimax, DOCSIS, and multi-user fiber such as GPON) have a fixed amount of spectrum/timeslots to allocate for transfers. Transfer timeslots are allocated primarily for downlink (I use 75% down) because the vast majority of user traffic is download so it just makes sense to allocate that way.
On the business side it is one way to segment your customer base between business/pro users and residential users because residential users don't care and businesses are less price-sensitive. When they need more upload they are often willing to pay for dedicated symmetric connections such as TDM circuits or ethernet over fiber (the industry term is "Active Ethernet"). In theory these circuits cost more to provide because the last mile isn't shared with other users.
