Using the bandwidth you're paying for is not an "abuse". It's pointless calling even Google Fiber unlimited - as you've stated anyone using up to the limit will be restricted.
"It's unlimited as long as you don't try and use it all the time!" What a load of bullshit.
I'm surprised the EFF were expecting Google to maintain a higher standard than other ISPs, especially since revelations that Google allowed the NSA a backdoor into every system.
(Full disclosure: I'm a Google employee.) Personally I think Edward Snowden is a whistleblower, not a traitor. However, I consider the leaks to be insufficient evidence for the conclusions you're drawing from them. Here was Google CEO Larry Page's response:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/what.html
I'm afraid I'd have to agree with the other person. Even IF Larry Page knew about the full extent of the NSA goings on inside Google (and he may very well not know), he is legally obliged to lie to us, and you, about them.
So, Googler, Tell me why you are convinced that Gmail is highly secure and my email is not being snarfed by the NSA?
Snowden has no reason to lie; he wouldn't have spoken out and ruined his life without strong moral convictions.
Larry Page has every reason to lie; probably enforced by the US government. The fact Google are operating within the law doesn't mean anything when such open-ended laws as the patriot act exist.
There is an important distinction between paying for connectivity, and paying for bandwidth. You will find that the 2nd costs substantially more, from any provider.
"It's unlimited as long as you don't try and use it all the time!" What a load of bullshit.
I'm surprised the EFF were expecting Google to maintain a higher standard than other ISPs, especially since revelations that Google allowed the NSA a backdoor into every system.