For the fame that comes from making a Rust rewrite + opening something 'closed'

And why would they pay for it? I can't see the ads anywhere.

It's worth something, but surely nowhere near enough to justify the $19b purchase 12 years ago, which if extended in line with meta's share price would mean it would be worth about $200b today

considering people today are messaging (typing in) more in whatsapp than in facebook as the latter is infested by AI content and dead internet theory more than ever.. well. I'd add to whatsapp valuation in their evil empire. I'd not be surprised it should be more valued by Zuck today than FB + Insta together as prospect for the future.. only to die as every online communicator eventually dies... call it ICQ, Skype or whatever...

I found that if you make the base styling and components, and then vibecode the layout/content, you get better results than letting the LLM make the base itself.

Obviously if your base is just unmodified shadcn, then it will look like any other toy site out there.

I don't use Tailwind becuase raw CSS wasn't powerful, but becuase it makes it easier to use.

I don't have to think about a class name, in what element to put that class, doing media queries or pseudo states and having separate the CSS files.

Also Tailwind IntelliSense helps a lot because you can see what styling is being applied to the element in the same place.

Shopify

Those 3 are my favorites languages, so I agree.

I'd add Go to the mix but yes all three are amazing languages. You do not need Java/C#/PHP etc anymore.

I don't see why Go needs to exist either when people are rewriting to Rust for anything backend related.

TanStack next?

tanner seems not-acquireable

Wasn't this because the photo was made "public" as in, shared through Google Photos?

If the doctor was not using a gmail account, the UI probably recomended to share it "with anyone that has the link" that is like public but protected by oscurity.

Most people don't realize that it is 99% like posting it on Facebook.

It isn't like posting it on Facebook. It is like emailing it, because most people don't have the link.

If it was a password entered into a form would you still consider it protected by obscurity? Both are the same level of security.

The URL may be logged by the ISP, university/company or whoever is providing the connection, antivirus, windows recall, browser history... But IIRC passwords are send using cryptography if the site uses https.

The URL is sent using http inside the https connection, so it's encrypted too. Your ISP shouldn't be able to see it unless they have root certs on your device.

It's not impossible that someone sees the URL, and if it's stored in an email the backups or local clients could store it plaintext, but I don't see how the URL is any more likely than the password to be sniffed during the connection itself

Its nothing like posting it on Facebook. Google doesn't have a recommendation engine that tries to share the image with random people, or a search that image will appear in, or a set of subscribed people who will be notified.

Its a random link someone would have to guess.

I can't read past what the paywall allows, but here's the nyt article: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveil...

With LLMs getting good, I've noticed people are more akin to fixing and new adding features to open-source projects that will never see the light of day.

It loosk more like React Native: https://github.com/geastack/examples/tree/main/apps/notes-na...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5RDfAmzE7s