Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | m_d's commentslogin

I'm sure I already posted this last time this subject came up, but the Soviets also prototyped a Moonraker-esque laser pistol for their cosmonauts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_laser_pistol


No picture :(


Here is another quote from Chomsky. It makes a lot of the same points, but it is much less hostile towards sports fans:

"Well, let me give an example. When I'm driving, I sometimes turn on the radio and I find very often that what I'm listening to is a discussion of sports. These are telephone conversations. People call in and have long and intricate discussions, and it's plain that quite a high degree of thought and analysis is going into that. People know a tremendous amount. They know all sorts of complicated details and enter into far-reaching discussion about whether the coach made the right decision yesterday and so on. These are ordinary people, not professionals, who are applying their intelligence and analytic skills in these areas and accumulating quite a lot of knowledge and, for all I know, understanding. On the other hand, when I hear people talk about, say, international affairs or domestic problems, it's at a level of superficiality that's beyond belief.

In part, this reaction may be due to my own areas of interest, but I think it's quite accurate, basically. And I think that this concentration on such topics as sports makes a certain degree of sense. The way the system is set up, there is virtually nothing people can do anyway, without a degree of organization that's far beyond anything that exists now, to influence the real world. They might as well live in a fantasy world, and that's in fact what they do. I'm sure they are using their common sense and intellectual skills, but in an area which has no meaning and probably thrives because it has no meaning, as a displacement from the serious problems which one cannot influence and affect because the power happens to lie elsewhere."

Basically, sports fans aren't stupid, they just don't think they can have any effect on anything more important (ex: politics).

http://www.alternet.org/noam-chomsky-why-americans-know-so-m...


Improving access to mental healthcare in the US would do a lot to reduce gun deaths.


For some perspective, check out the CDC's "Leading Causes of Death":

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm


Does Palo Alto have regulations regarding minimum apartment size? If not, lower-cost microapartment complexes might make a good long-term investment.


Good luck building anything in Palo Alto.


I'm not familiar with the real estate situation there beyond "people are being priced out of Palo Alto". Is the city averse to all new construction or just lower-cost housing?


Google "Palo Alto NIMBY".


AIUI, the NIMBY-ism in Palo Alto is second only to that in San Francisco.


both


I've enjoyed banking with Simple over the past couple years, but if they move my account to BBVA, I'll be leaving for a credit union.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBVA#Criminal_charges:_money_la... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBVA#Connection_to_drug_syndica...

I know most banks have some skeletons in their closets, but BBVA seems to be less ethical than average.


Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution by Stephen Levy (http://amzn.com/1449388396)

A great look at the people involved in the early years of personal computing, including Stallman, Gates, Wozniak, etc. Apart from the technology, Levy discusses the basic philosophy and motivations of the personalities involved.


I haven't read it, so I can't vouch for it, but Snakes in Suits [1] is a frequently recommended book on this subject.

[1] http://amzn.com/0061147893


Great book on the topic. Talks a lot about how they do function in society (great business man-jerk of a boss, Provides well for family-controlling husband/father, etc). The book 'Sociopath Next Door' also goes further on how to deal with them.


Was there any further evidence of this? I remember a lot of speculation at the time of Hasting's death, but I never saw anything conclusive.


I've no idea about what actually happened to Mr. Hastings, however, the GP raises a valid point that such things definitely can be used to kill people like him.


I never saw anything plausible, let alone conclusive.


With all the recent revelations about the US government, I think it's very plausible.


Are we talking Bourne Ultimatum? Because that was 2007.


Fast & Furious 6 was 2013.


I do need to watch that.


The default design reminds me of Joy Division.

http://imgur.com/OaKCSUp


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: