I went all-in on AI coding assistants and my GitHub heatmap went vertical. I built a side project in a few weeks that would have taken me months before. But then the project stalled for non-technical reasons (app store review ). It made me question whether we're just measuring activity instead of actual impact. I wrote down my thoughts on this "productivity paradox." Curious to hear if others are experiencing the same thing.
Google needs to pay someone to come up with better demos. Atleast this one is 100x better than the talking to pluto dumb demo they came up with few years ago.
It's really not very difficult to do this. RISC-V is deliberately quite a simple ISA. The Sail model for it is only a few thousand lines of code, and you don't need remotely that much to run Linux if you compile for a limited target ISA (no floating point, etc.).
Can you please not break the HN guidelines even when there isn't the full text? Angrily entitled comments are definitely not in the spirit of the site.
OP said "a few". The paper says LIGO et al. are sensitive up to an order of 3 or 4; planned interferometers are targeted at lower ranges. The needed device needs to be sensitive to modes of at least order 12---but preferably order 21 & higher (to cover all theories). So, realistically, they're about 18 orders of magnitude off. Conservatively.