Do I understand this correctly in that if the list goes on, it will also show posts with unrelated tags in tag_names? As the filter is only applied to match_count?
So to only get blog posts with matching tags we would need to add a filter „match_count > 0“, right?
I‘ve been fascinated by this film for years now and highly recommend it for anyone who likes artistic and a bit surreal sci-fi films. It‘s one of the few films that somehow deeply touches me, where I can fully immerse.
We're using Metashape and Reality Capture. We used to use Bentley, but they've got unethical business practices so we're avoiding them now.
Metashape has really good licensing, and their software runs on Linux and is easy to integrate into processing pipelines, also they've got a big featureset.
Reality Capture was super expensive, though that has seemingly changed now that they're bought by Epic, so we might reconsider our strategy there. They make better use of hardware, making them faster, and their resulting models look great. Their licensing was so expensive that we just couldn't afford switching all of our processing to RC.
If you can get a good deal with them it's probably fine, and we only talked to nice people there. But we're still on limited runway, we can't deal with random $20k invoices, even if a nice sales rep reverts the charge when called.
Errr... reading your points I presume you've never really done that (notifying a service provider).
> Why don't you contact police or the site owner instead?
Police? Seriously? My police here in germany or the italian police? What do you think will happen? Right: nothing.
Site owner? If you can tell me the site owner from an IP... I will do that.
> You risk prosecution.
By telling a service provider that they host malicious content and should do sth. about it? Now that's an interesting view.
> If it's a brazen criminal using their own host [...] No customer support required.
The customer support was the only way to contact the provider. It doesn't matter if they are housing or hosting malicious content. They are at least partly responsible, especially if someone is telling them.
The saltstack quality/release cycle may be the cause of some of the pileup.
I experienced a minor issue with saltstack recently and submitted a new issue. Turns out the saltstack devs had already addressed the issue, but the fix was staged for release weeks later. Between the time I reported my issue and the release of 2017.7.3 this week, my issue was marked as related to a half dozen reports of the behavior in different circumstances.
While regression testing is a good thing your infrastructure software is a Good Thing, the process of staging known bug fixes will tend to multiple the number of open issues as multiple users report their findings.
And the problem is that Facebook has dozens of scores about our personality which allow them to individually steer and control people.
What you share is not what all your "friends" see. They see what Facebook decides to show. Plus what else Facebook decides is helping to keep your friends happy with the platform.
Facebook is not like Wikipedia, a platform for all to freely and transparently share, no it's only purpose is to bind us to the platform and get willing ad targets.
I couldn't agree more - one search engine is a terrible thing. But for other reasons.
It's amazing to see how in other areas people complain about monopolies but when it comes to our window to the digital world, most of us seem to be fine with it.
One US monopoly that dictates what should be important for us, filters what we see based on secret algorithms, forces us to "optimize" our websites in this and that way along their "standards".
Google has good technology but we should wake up and see they are not the altruists they like to tell everyone.