I'm using Apple Studio Displays and have been on the lookout for a solution like this for quite a while. My grail is a Thunderbolt KVM; there are a couple on the market, but they cost a fortune and have terrible reviews. I guess the use case is so narrow that nobody is investing in it.
An alternative could be a good 5K/6K monitor with a KVM, but this is a unicorn as well...
> An alternative could be a good 5K/6K monitor with a KVM, but this is a unicorn as well...
I use a Dell U3224KB (32" 6K) in this way. Thunderbolt (usbc) is connected to a Macbook Pro and DP & regular usb c is connected to Windows gaming machine. Works perfectly. And yes, the U3224KB is pretty ugly, but I've grown to love it's features.
I wonder how this cat-and-mouse game will end. I've been using my own wrapper around Claude CLI that overcomes some 'claude -p' limitations, and now I have even more reasons to.
But inevitably, this will end, ultimately making AI a bit less accessible for consumers.
It's not so well known that one of the original rationales for "offside rule" programming languages is that it works just as easily for handwritten code as it does for typed.
Will we ever have programming languages that are primarily designed to take input from whiteboard grabs? (ie where not only handwriting, but also placement, connectivity, and maybe shape are meaningful?)
1. SwiftBar has more plugin types, i.e. quite a bit more flexible and covers more usecases
2. SwiftBar is more actively maintained
3. SwiftBar has a bunch of minor\quality of life features, such as Notifications suppport, integration with Shortcuts, extensive URL-scheme, support for custom Plugin Repositories(useful in a company setting).
4. The only major feature that SwiftBar lacks, comparing to bitbar\xbar is built-in parametrization support
An alternative could be a good 5K/6K monitor with a KVM, but this is a unicorn as well...