I don't understand what your point of signaling that you have no virtue is. Care to explain why you just did that? Why are you so compelled to signal that about yourself?
You're not wrong, but it's one of the many reasons that the Play store has become a complete sewer in terms of quality, safety, and legality of the products offered.
Like Facebook, Twitter, etc. Google built the Play store (and Android at large, really) as a barn with all the doors open, and have been slowly closing them when users get too angry about a given (ridiculous for a multi-billion dollar corporation) problem.
Apple, on the other hand, built a walled garden and added doors to it as needed, and occasionally has taken some away too. You can use the cynical read and say this is to further their position in the market as the "pro privacy" alternative to Google, or you can say it's part of their core company ethos, but the result is the same either way: buying an app off the App Store carries little/no risk, and Apple strongly favors users during any issues that may arise. Play store on the other hand can be 100% safe or extremely risky, with little/no way to tell beforehand, and Google's end user support is notoriously terrible.
Cloudflare doesn't welcome you if you don't let it track you and run arbitrary code it injects. You can verify that by disabling javascript and/or using proxies, vpns, tor.
If you've ever looked up at the sky at night in a dark area I don't think you could honestly say it's "dead emptiness". It's fascinating to gaze up at the stars and taking that away would be a tragedy
> The United States certified in April 2017 and in July 2017 that Iran was complying with the deal.[371][372]
> On 13 October 2017 U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he would not make the certification required under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, accusing Iran of violating the "spirit" of the deal[…]
I was checking the news here, but I didn't find an article that suggests that Iran violated the agreement:
I think it's the reverse. If you write pure functional components, React is very understandable. It's easily testable, you know that you'll have the same output if you pass it the same props. Svelte templates just take us back where we've been, with the twist of compiling the templates, which I believe some templating libraries already did.
You can dive down and learn the inner workings, the same as you can dive down and learn how the svelte compiler works, but it's not needed for either one. Understanding the concept is more important.
I'm a huge React fanboy, but if you try and step through the React code with a debugger, we're kind of a far cry from the days of Backbone and even Angular. For the common mortal, it has to be treated as a black box. Fortunately, its fairly stable, so it's rare you have to care, but...
Yeah, the ability to step into Backbone code and back out of it into my own code was one of the things I liked about Backbone.
That said, React's mental model is so powerful that I've almost never needed to actually debug into it to see what's going on. If you've got an issue, tracing the dataflow in your own code is generally sufficient. So, I'm okay treating it as a black box.
