Smoking indoors was discussed in the past and clearly the decision was not to allow it, because it harms others.

> If I go to court, I win. There is no other outcome.

Har har har. Spoken like somebody who's never been in a courtroom or read about a court case before. You still have to tick all the technicality boxes before you can win, starting with proving that the law actually says Google has to delete this. You also have to follow all the implicit rules of court procedure, which are the main reason you always need a lawyer.

To me the blog post feels as though AI has had significant input in the writing. Whether it's entirely AI written or AI ideated with some human input on the writing I don't know. So it's not really a surprise to see this sort of statement.

Everything that I don't like, agree with, or think is wrong is written by ai.

Op doesn't realize there are so many legal terms that will make what he thinks is criminal not criminal and give them so many ways out of it these same people literally write the law good luck sir

Lol at 'winning' a GDPR case against Google on a technical point. My first thought was 'Oh Sweet Summer Child' and realising that Max Schrems and NOYB aren't as well known as I originally thought.

https://noyb.eu/en https://schre.ms/

Rags to rags in three generations, don't forget. These people are not Warren Buffett and most likely do not share his skill, luck, and psychological investment.

The grandson was in FFA (Future Farmers of America) in high school. My guess is the Buffett family values environment was not typical suburban USA.

Buffett’s giving almost all his wealth away so not the usual rags-to-rags.

The grandson has a pretty successful career already anyways (helped obviously by his relation to Warren)

A legitimate benefit of vertical integration. They control their own CPUs so they can just do that. Linux has to run on whatever it's given.

despite the funny backronym, Wine actually IS a WINdows Emulator. Someone apparently told them that it's only called an emulator if it's emulating a CPU architecture, but that's not true.

I thought it was an implementation of the Win32 API as a compatibility layer.

What is it emulating exactly?

DOS interrupts, for starters.

Does Windows NT have a Windows 9x API emulator?

Windows NT predates Windows 95 for two years.

And yes it did had emulators for Windows 16, and DOS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_DOS_machine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_on_Windows

If you squint a bit (well, a lot really), Win32S on 3.1 and Windows 95’s Win32 implementation are Windows NT emulators running on top of 16 bit Windows.

its closer to a translator than an emulator

Also didn't they actually do this and realize that Windows API on x86/64 was as stable as anything they could invent?

And they won't credit you.

Navier-Stokes wasn't even an algorithm, it was a proof that something is possible while obeying certain equations.

GDP is just a measure of how expensive things are: inflation. It literally measures the total price of all the things that are bought and sold.

It was originally a contrast: "information wants to be free, because .... and information wants to be expensive, because ...."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free#H...