1. product managers will try to make things dead easy, by setting up simple excel formulas & charts. Taking screenshots etc
2. data engineers will do more technical but opensourced solutions like superset & dbt
3. corporates usually tends to build the end UI themselves. I remember sth that (maybe?) Pinterest opensourced.
I deeply understand how hard it is to build a notebook like this. And there are indeed some problems lying in the collaboration and UX.
It's just so hard to propose those features, given the problem is usually the data itself and a highly competitive market. Popsql does not thrive as I remembered.
The data itself is indeed a problem. More than that, I'd add that the very definition of what's being measured or calculated is an even bigger problem (i.e. what's an active user?)
Still, I think that we can get to a place where everyone uses the same tool to collaborate on data matters, like a "Retool for data/BI". At a high-level, that's the direction we're going, and we're starting with notebooks and dashboards.
Just my 2 cents. Somehow got a chance to look into the competitive landscape. And found that which ever ICP to start with there's no immediate reason for adoption.
But who knows? Back in 90s no one knows they need an iPhone. Wish all the luck for your journey onwards.
I've seen 2 people who cares about the stack more than the task itself. They lose their job
way more often than average and is often criticized for not able to complete their task on time.
Some hiring managers tend you quiz you with framework details instead of your learning & reasoning ability. Avoid those teams.
> Just think of it as a new additional tool in your toolbelt
This is the best way to introduce it. Vercel makes it too complicated in the docs where everything is splitted into app/pages, creating a large ecosystem gap.
> And then, you may start to train your gut by just sitting on the toilet
This is actually what my dad has told me. I feel he's crazy because there's just no way to shit if you are empty. I guess I have to reconsider it...
> Sugar is actually "bad" for our guts bacteria composition. Reduce it for half a year and see the effects.
Do you have sources? I actually watched some doctors saying when you are having a stomachache go get some sweetened (but not too sweentend lol) water. So I've always assumed that sugar is good for our guts.
You can look it up "sugar microbiom". Our gut and the 2.5 kg of bakteria in it are our defense against everything and is strongly needed for a good sit-down. Just like chronic diarrhea is caused by a non-working microbiom, the ultra-fat people suddenly start to lose weight after a stool-transplantation.. or, our immunity system is highly influenced by the microbiom.
The microbiom consists of different bacteria stems and fungi that fight for food as a question of live-or-die. If you have a high intake of sugar, you give the ones of the fungii and bac.stems an advantage, that specialized on splitting raw sugar for energy. Sugar is the most easiest shape of energy for the foes. So, they will grow faster than the other bacteria/fungi, eventually pushing out competition. But all of them gut's contents have a purpose and having one competitor being pushed out would mean, some purpose is not fulfilled.
So.. eat more of dietary fibers, less sugar and more of things like bread, milk products, rice and noodles, potatos. Less fat-fried and sweetened things. You'll see a difference after a few weeks.
Beetroot somehow has a good effect on shitting too xD
https://imgur.com/a/uhVDp07