Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | odst's commentslogin

I think one of the reasons people think this is slop is because of the name. How does the name EmDash relate to being a wordpress spiritual successor? It's clear the name was chosen as it relates to the use of em dashes in AI generated text, so why would you want to be associated with that? Why not choose a name like Astro Press given your experience on Astro?

Not sure why you’re being downvoted. The name is so bad. WordPress is a great name for normies. Something like Cloudflare Press would make more sense. EmDash is at best a temporary meme.

> It's clear the name was chosen as it relates to the use of em dashes in AI generated text

this is not clear to me, and is not discussed in the article

you can like or dislike the name. but criticizing the quality of work based on your affinity for the name is foolishness


It doesn’t need to be said in the article, it’s obvious. EmDash is a term associated with slop.

Well, an em dash is used in text to identify a pause or alternatives in the text.

..so like a fork in the way it's done, a new way of doing things.

But you need to remove the dev/ai hat in order to go back to writing rules and the real use.


"We won't do something like this again"

Sureeeeee


Will surely do something like another thing nobody wanted or needed instead.

Not even. Maybe briefly saw an advertisement, but didn't click it.

tbh just looked at the cover you know?

I was on LinkedIn last night, and someone posted their new SAAS. The website was basically a calendar where you could log what you did each day of the month. I checked my memory usage, and that site was using 1GB of memory. They were also charging $100 for it...

The argument that "vibe coding makes computer programming accessible to the masses" is something I don't understand. With all the free content on the internet, was it not accessible before?

It takes most people years of burying their heads in a computer to become effective programmers of anything more than trivial software. This is rapidly changing.

That hasn't changed at all. You simply cannot be an effective programmer using AI. Heck, if you're having the thing write programs for you then you aren't a programmer at all at that point, because programming is the act of writing code. But you can't make good software if you just have the LLM bang it out for you, so nothing has changed.

Obviously the knowledge gap required to go from zero to doing something useful has shrunk substantially. That is improved accessibility.

I've been interested in moving my windows machine to Linux. Do you have any recommendations for distros to use? Last time I used Linux was Linux Mint. It was fine, but definitely felt less polished compared to Windows or Mac OS


I would go either with Ubuntu or Fedora. The entry barrier is lower, they work well and shouldn't be too troublesome to install/maintain.

Then check whether you prefer Gnome or KDE as the looks and go with what you find cooler.

I've used Ubuntu most of my career and it's solid, these days I'm testing Fedora at home due to some nitpicks I have, but both are good options.


I've been using Linux for a long time, which might sound like I'm comfortable with all its rough edges, but it's honestly the opposite. Early on it was a new toy and I would accept issues as part of messing around with it. The past 10~15 years on the other hand, I've needed to get serious work done on it, and also use it for PC gaming, so I've gone the other way and focused on getting the most no-nonsense easy setup where I don't have to be tinkering with things all the time.

Based on that, I'd say: go for a popular distro with KDE. I'm sure there are other very polished options out there, but my recommendation is Kubuntu, even though it's not the one I use today (I use Arch mostly), as it's very simple to set up and well supported.


I have been very happy with Fedora, generally has up-to-date software and usually just works


Manjaro is a very sane distro


What do people like about cursor? I've been using it for the past couple days, and I just don't see many positive things about it. It seems people like the autocomplete so I'll have to give that a try.

There's just too many "features" the ux ends up being all over the place. I thought having the browser inside of the editor would be great for design, but it's not that much better than just having your browser open along with your editor.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: