Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more phpnode's commentslogin

This is really great!

Refusey DO YOU REFUSE? We're refusing to drive things that matter.

http://tiffzhang.com/startup/index.html?s=61244441196


DESIRE YOUR AFFAIR. Introducing the world’s first delightful affair.

It feels good to be part of the Affairhub family.

http://tiffzhang.com/startup/index.html?s=176349848043

Ok I'll stop now. Some of these are pretty amusing though.


"Body was created to help you find bodies in your area. From local bodies to national brands, no one knows bodies like Body."

http://tiffzhang.com/startup/?s=322017367463


When my friends need new dealers there's only one word I tell them, Dealr.

http://tiffzhang.com/startup/index.html?s=542136839125


Dealr is a supply-chain solution for Weedly.


I'd consider investing in Refusey!


Why bother? Your investment proposal would be refused most likely.


offtopic - I've seen a number of blog posts using this hand drawn diagram style recently, does anyone happen to know how it's done? (answers other than "by hand" appreciated)


Looks like Paper, by FiftyThree:

https://appsto.re/us/KfqkE.i


Correct. If you're going to try it, I recommend getting a stylus for your iPad, since handwriting with your fingertip doesn't work very well.


Pencil (by FiftyThree) works great, of course. And unlocks the additional features in the Paper app. I'm actually quite impressed by how well it works.

http://www.fiftythree.com/pencil


There is an open pull request that adds "workers" to io.js, uses threads - https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/1159


Ok, good to know, thanks.


The zip files on that page contain the source for kdb, I thought I'd take a look at how it works.... nope! That is impenetrable


It's impenetrable to you, in the same way Mandarin is impenetrable at first glance to someone used to reading Latin languages.


no, he isn't:

> "To go out and buy new engines for the B-52, you'd have a really hard time fitting that into our program, but that's why we're interested in a public-private partnership, which would be a different way to amortize those engines over time and pay for them in the savings that they actually generate, instead of paying for them out of savings that you hope for.

This sounds like a Private Finance Initiative as the GP mentioned


So basically, asking GE or Pratt & Whitney to fit modern turbofan engines upfront for free, and getting paid out of the fuel and/or maintenance savings over time?


That’s the idea, but it’s a profit making exercise for these companies. In all, they charge far, far more than the up front cost.

Not to mention, they’ll charge based on an annual fee for every year the engines are in service. And if there’s anything the original B52 taught us, it’s that avionic hardware is in service for far, far longer than we estimate when we buy it.


I suppose, not knowing what "far, far more" actually is, that could be appropriate. Typically, whether it's a loan or some kind of "partnership" when you ask someone else to front the expenses for your project/purchase you end up paying a lot more over time than if you had the cash in hand.


"Public private partnership" is a scheme that avoids traditional approval processes for debts, and introduces risk elements that allow the private partner to make money, and makes the financing cost difficult to measure. Instead of bonding engines and carrying the cost in the books, they are effectively leasing the engines.


>Instead of bonding engines and carrying the cost in the books, they are effectively leasing the engines.

leasing by the Line-Of-Business vs. capital investment through IT has been the root of the cloud revolution in the IT industry. Now military starts to learn the trick. Weapons as a Service...


@dang why was this thread censored?


> Also, is it a good idea to connect a machine that has an unprotected operating system to the internet?

If the operating system has no IP stack or networking of any kind then it's probably ok


Would you trust those benchmarks if they did? Much better that a third party creates them


That's why I mentioned projections too. I'd just love to hear a RethinkDB person tell us how they see themselves in relation to it's alternatives. I don't particularly care about their current performance because it's a young project. I don't even know if they see real-time performance as their core value proposition.

Tho of course, a third party analysis of RethinkDB's architecture would be amaizing (-; Benchmarks not so much.



Your email address isn't listed in your profile (you might have entered it in the "email" box, but that's not visible to other people)


It is dchichkov at gmail...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: