Depends on the market. In Australia Tesla is much pricier than all the Chinese options (more the norm). In my area people who would have probably bought a Tesla are looking at BMW's range.
They have some rider rules around keeping the car clean (screenshot link below). I'm not sure if they are enforced to this level but they do have at least one camera in the car (above the middle rear seat).
I like this theory. I wonder the "Delete after 30 days" part used to work and then they added some more security features which made it not work unless the phone was unlocked. i.e. it could delete out of the DB but failed to delete the file if the phone was locked when the job ran.
HITRUST certification is the most demoralizing thing I've done in my life. You need a policy, a procedure and evidence of things like this:
Shared system resources (e.g., registers, main memory, secondary storage) are released back to the system, protected from disclosure to other systems/applications/users, and users cannot intentionally or unintentionally access information remnants.
I understand exactly what you mean, but having done HITRUST CSF certification for a system, I will say that it is not as bad as some others, because at least HITRUST is /very/ clear in its requirements, so there's not as much vagaries and back and forth with auditors after the fact, or rushed changes. It's truly a nightmare to meet, but once done you can be assured you will pass the audit fairly.
Yep, try doing that in an electron context and you quickly learn why a lot of this software still runs on mainframes with UX from the 80s, hard T1 lines (if they’re lucky enough to be off ISDNs), faxing things all around since that’s considered “secure”, etc etc. A lot of startups can’t touch this stuff due to regulatory hurdles. When the first step is “go change the law”, it’s a non-starter.
I mean, if it was really a very high security system, ensuring that confidential info in memory cannot be written unencrypted to a swap file, does seem like a reasonable requirement.
Nice art works and slick experience. Some suggestions
1. While waiting for the art to be generated, get the user to do a hot-or-not between some existing art to get a better sense of what they like and then generate them something
2. Have a little more feedback on how much longer they'll need to wait while generating
3. Once generated, show the artwork framed and hanging somewhere not just the rendering
4. When a user kicks off a job, kick off a bunch in parallel using some other styles in case the style they pick really doesn't work well.
I especially like the last one, particularly for a user's first creation - because if their first creation doesn't work out so well, it's often their last. Auto-creating a few jobs based on their content image - with styles that are known to work pretty well - would really improve their experience and first impressions.
I've tried it recently. I lasted < 10 minutes. The spinner in the tabs while things load are very distracting. cnn.com causes it to start spinning every 8 seconds for about 3 seconds.
As the linked article states, all personally identifiable information is removed, but you still want to be able to say "Alice worked with Bob in folder 1, and that same Alice worked with Charlie in folder 2", so you assign unique identifiers to each user, such that you can't tie Alice to "Prof. Smith at University of Chicago", but you can tie folder 1 and folder 2 to the same Alice.
The GDPR has provisions for information like this, specifically to say that small pieces of information can together still constitute personal data. Consider that you can retrieve names if you map someone's professional interactions with this kind of detail.
Regardless of whether or not the GDPR applies to these people, it's a useful tool to illustrate why this kind of data is still wrong to share (especially without any kind of consent!).
> It is very possible for the entire team to walk out on you
Possible: Yes, I guess. Probably: No. @3-10 people when growth is at or above expectation then the staff are almost always loyal to their invested interest unless there is a very big scandal.
I would work out the difference between the salary at say Google vs what you took during your tenure at the startup then double it because of lack of upside.
Aside: If the co-founder is an HN reader, then they probably know the throwaway account is you. That is going to skew this negotiation.
I've been looking for something like this and didn't want to embed Qualtrics/Survey Monkey in a WebView. It doesn't have all the question types we need but looks quite straight forward to add them.
reply