Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rafram's commentslogin

> Shows the evidence behind every flag, so you can disagree with it

> Logs every Bluetooth device it hears, glasses or not

How much AGI is required before LLMs stop putting totally irrelevant technical details into marketing copy?


I don't mind if models do that but I don't understand why a human doesn't take 2 minutes to proof and re-word/delete them

I feel as though it’s inherent in the models, as part of “alignment” or whatever. I’ve noticed whenever having an LLM help with data analysis, especially Claude, it just can’t help itself from putting caveats and guides and documentation inline or in footers.

And if you correct it, it will mention "a previous version said..."

I also like:

> Nothing leaves your phone and there is no account.

This is good to know, but it's the exact type of thing Claude is obsessed with putting everywhere once you tell it NOT to do something. For example, if I tell it to commit but never push changes to GitHub, it can't help but leave "Changes committed; nothing was pushed." to EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE. The model just can't help but report back about everything it's NOT doing, and it drives me crazy.


I like those kinds of updates (as long as they are accurate of course)

What’s annoying is the stuff it decides to put into user facing copy, details that they’d never give a shit about, calling everything real, etc


None of the libraries in New York City are publicly owned. NYPL, BPL, and QPL are all private nonprofits that receive public funding. It’s an odd arrangement.

The online iD editor is powerful enough for even pretty complex/big edits in my experience, with good basemap options and intuitive controls. I don’t see any need to download JOSM.

Exactly my thoughts. Advising to download and use JOSM to a novice OSM mapper to make their first edit there (to add a single tag, of all things) instead of iD is nonsense to me, just totally unnecessary overkill. I don’t even understand how article author decided it’s a good idea, to be honest.

You can (and manufacturers do) release security updates for past major-version releases without backporting features.

At least for Android that's not a big deal as most of the system lives in independent applications.

I don’t see anything that odd about them. They’re young models of various ethnicities - basically the same people you’d see modeling the clothes at a store like Target. And they’re wearing/doing things that seem relatable to Apple’s core upper-middle-class customer base.

There are tortilla chips that do contain gluten, or are cross-contaminated with it. A gluten-free label means they guarantee <20ppm gluten in the product. That’s useful info!

They are innocent until they’re proven guilty.



Yeah, Bluesky is pretty much singlemindedly focused on hating AI at this point. It's odd. Sort of feels like it's becoming a sanctuary (though definitely not a healthy one) for people who just can't deal with the post-2020 world - a lot of yelling about people who don't mask up, who dare to use AI, etc.


It's possible to tune your Bluesky filter bubble to avoid those people.


Northern California is dusty too. But green!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: