I envy China for their willingness to invest lots of effort in moving forward and innovating. I would never live there because I don't feel that throwing away all notions of privacy is worth it. The totalitarian aspect of the Chinese government along with some territorial disputes are the only real sense of negative feelings most people I know have towards China.
It works well for courses which are based on critical reasoning such as physics and mathematics. Going both with and without textbooks for many courses I can say that the textbook doesn't make much difference if the notes from the course are done well. If they aren't then the class can be a real pain.
A lot of governments want to do away with physical currency as it is simply much more difficult to track than electronic transactions. I believe it is one of the reasons China put a lot of effort in developing their mobile payment systems.
That is just a further step in the training that could be undertaken. Many of the advances in machine vision come piecemeal for instance. One team advances one idea that does some thing(s) very well, but has some drawback(s) which another team comes up with a solution for at a later date. Maintainability of code could be something the AI is eventually trained to take into account.
maintainability is irrelevant if the whole site can be regenerated in seconds with the new changes required.
I'm okay with this though. Creating websites is tedious and is most analogous to cranking a handle as it is a learnable skill. After a while it is clear it is just banging characters and seeing what changed on the screen this time.
Bear in mind I'm only talking about implementing the layout, colors, texts and responsiveness. Any dynamic functionality such as forms, buttons, dialogs, integrations and talking to servers is still potentially very complex and difficult taking.
Or you could take the route which others have taken, and show them why their ideas are wrong through your actions. There are plenty of examples of extremists being converted through friendship.
They don't need to be rational for it to work. They can both either become more rational over time, or you can influence them in irrational ways. Both often go together hand-in-hand in good diplomacy (e.g. letting the other save face even if they don't "deserve it").
Classic case of whataboutism. I didn't see anything discussing the quality of the US mental health system. It's a Canadian website discussing a Canadian case. It failed here and the author of the article is trying to point out where it failed. This is an attempt to prod the system to improve.
Definitely agree. I saw virtually no comparison to what the US does / would do nor how America handles similar cases, etc. America was mentioned zero times in the article (0) and United States was mentioned twice in the article (2) and that was only to mention background information about the victim and her family, nothing to do with health care, mental illness, violence, or anything else to do with the editorial.
But then again look at the title "How Canada's..." implying this was something peculiar to Canada in contrast to other health care systems. Any discussion of Canada's health care system is going to invite comparison to others isn't it?
It is most likely in the "I need to make up something outrageous" part of the country. I have used Greyhound to go out of downtown LA and SF which are both situated in some of the worst places of their respective cities which are still accessible and saw nothing of the sort. The LA one was definitely very sketchy, but the Greyhound experience for me wasn't much different than the experience using long haul bus travel here in Europe. Yea the facilities are more run down, but the bus rides are much more fun since people actually talk to each other.
It is the same for almost anybody studying in a foreign country. It takes a fairly high level of self-confidence to really put yourself out there and cultural/linguistic differences can be confusing to navigate. I myself have studied in 3 foreign countries and can say that it requires a lot of effort to make local friends.
I have to agree that it isn't the quintessential book to understanding the right. It starts off with good intentions, but she misses a few things, most likely as a result of not being able to escape her bias. I found the following review something to keep in mind if you do read the book. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2016/09/30/book-revie...
