Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | reesericci's commentslogin

As a union organizer with Hack Club staff, this is only the surface - the things that are clear to the end consumer. It gets a whole lot worse on the inside; from payment below minimum wage, mandatory overtime beyond child labor law, hiring kids as contractors to deny them rights, union busting & retaliation and a blatant disrespect for members and community democracy despite pretending to be `teen-led.` I'm not going to re-hash the whole thing here, I've written an article on my blog, but Hack Club is a deeply misleading "charity" that suckers teens in trying to build a better world and funnels them towards supporting our ever-rapid decline into techno-fascism at the hands of the wealthy elite funding them.


This user was banned from Hack Club for attempting to stage an "uprising" against the org, and has also engaged in tactics like Wikipedia vandalism. I would not take their word for being "a union organizer with Hack Club staff", although their blog does make several good points (https://place.reeseric.ci/writings/2024-05-05/)


More transparency on the background of this poster: https://hackmd.io/@alexjs/Bkm1KIpxR


I know the person behind this personally and can attest that they are a licensed ham.


What is their callsign? It is public record.


KQ4GVP (that's me!)


I don't mean to be crass, but a ~2 year old HN account with no discernible attachment to a real-world identity, and 38 karma, means nothing.


You can google their username which looks like a pretty discernible attachment to a real-world identity to me.


Oooh, check out Mr. Five-digit-user-id over here (for the kids: an old /. reference).

The user name is their radio callsign, which you can look up in the FCC database. I don't know how much more attachment to a "real-world identity" you're looking for.


Ad-hominem much? It sure matters who the person in question making the statement is, but what's particularly relevant here, and to my comment, is that it's not easily discernible who they are.


boi.ngo for airport wifi


I mean couldn't a registry also shaft you?


This should be less frequent and IMHO, under many circumstance, you are protected by consumer law (citation needed). You also have more freedom when picking the domain name (fuckmicrosoft.co is less than 2$ on GoDaddy, but good luck trying to get fuckmicrosoft.github.io).

Also one issue that I neglected to raise is this can be very unstable. If some scammer/malware use your service (I know that you have a review process, but you still won't know for sure), Google SafeBrowse may mark your whole domain as harmful. I don't know if you have a contingency for this, but you need one in place.


If a registrar dies you could transfer to another one. That's not possible with subdomains since there can only be one issuer


registry, not registrar


To answer the first question, yep it's just "oblong".

We exist so people don't have to go to freenom when they want their own but free domain. I've used Freenom in the past, and they are the worst experience.


That's why we have manual review.


No it doesn't. Firefox has terrible support for Passkeys at the moment. Try using Google Chrome/Edge/Safari/etc.


Chromium 114 here, it only gives me the option to use a physical security key, or Windows Hello (which then proceeds to also demand a physical security key).

Would prefer if they just accepted my randomly generated 64 character passwords, since I already use a password manager (KeePassXC).


That's only for verifying email - it's WebAuthn/Passkeys.


You're ok with cutting off a large number of potential users? Passkey isn't exactly working well on Firefox or Windows right now.


The first one mainly. The Code of Conduct is just standard Contributor Covenant stuff for people who contribute back code.


Yep!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: