Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | roberte's commentslogin


Well, for Bob's bank to owe $50 more to Bob they need to be compensated so Alice's bank now owes $50 to Bob's bank. In other words, Bob's bank must trust Alice's shitty bank.

Unlike the dollar, Bitcoin is not the transfer of debt.


In Sweden you pay 3% of your gross salary but there's a cap so you never have to pay more than 135 euros a month for a child.

If you have more cildren, you'll pay 2% for the second (max 90 euro), 1% for the third (max 45 euros) and nothing for the fourth.


I have friends in Sweden and I've always envied the childcare costs.

In London I pay £170 per day to have my two children in childcare. That's for private childcare, but you have little choice if you want to go back to work (because of the hours). There's a little give in the costs of different nurseries but most have a waiting list to get in where we're based (and the lowest I've seen locally is £75/day/child).

We now receive a £120(ish)/month government subsidy for our oldest child. That's something I guess - doesn't do much to help with the £1300 or so we pay per month.

It wasn't really worth it financially for my wife to go back to work, though it does give a much needed break from constantly looking after children (ironically, she's a speech therapist for small children). By the time you account for transport / lunch etc in London we're about breaking even.

It's pretty depressing when you're trying to get a company off the ground and all your money goes into childcare.


Beats is a great brand, they should retire iTunes instead.


Given recent announcements (Apple Watch, Apple Pay), a likely name would be "Apple Music". Would that be permissible under their contract with Apple Records?


Apple Inc. owns the trademark now so they can pretty much do what they want, I'd think.


Would they need to shut the service down to rebrand it?


Beats is a good brand for the headphones. iTunes is much more valuable than Beats Music.


Good brand yes, but shitty headphones.


Apple Beats would make a great new music brand.


Make a keyboard where you have one key for each finger. You get all characters by pressing combinations of keys. There are 1024 possible combinations.


As a pianist of several years, I don't tend to think that chording is a very good idea for fast typing. Certain chord combinations are never very graceful and are a good recipe for tendon strain. We learn to avoid certain fingering because of these hand limitations, and part of the reason we can do that easily is because we are generally moving our hands all over the keyboard. The secret to effective piano playing (to limit strain and tiredness and harm) is honestly the complete opposite of what a lot of computer-keyboard-minimalists seem to be striving for - pianists are supposed to minimize finger movement, and send as much of that movement upstream as possible. Transfer finger to hand, hand to wrist, wrist to arm, arm to body - limit individual finger activity as much as possible for relaxed playing. The idea of minimizing computer keyboard keys for having less keys, and putting more responsibility on agile fingers while freezing the hand in one location, seems exactly backward if the goal is for fast, efficient, fluid strain-free typing.


With stenography, you do transfer much of the "push" to your forearms (and keeping the wrist reasonably still). You just place your fingers in the right position for the keys you want. It's unlike typing where you use the force of your fingers to actuate the keys.

The primary goal of steno though isn't to provide chords - it's to learn a short-hand language enough to reduce whole words or sentences down to a single stroke of the arm - so you can get down much more information with less movement.


Insightful comment, thanks for giving a perspective from a completely different profession. :)

There is however something i need to point out to you: Chording is not for fast typing. In fact, since you must hit multiple keys either sequentially or together, just to produce a single signal to the computer, it is guaranteed to be slower. However chorded keyboards would make it possible to type in restricted situations, such as people who are hospitalized, missing limbs, working on something where the other hand is occupied or where body motions are limited, on the go, or heck, simply while lying back and relaxing; while still maintaining a useful speed.


1023, unless you want it to spew characters when you aren't touching it.


Realistically one would not want to use the combinations requiring many fingers (the variants using nine fingers gives you just ten combinations more).

Using max four fingers per input still gives you 10+10x9/2+10x9x8/6+10x9x8x7/24=385 combinations.


That already exists. The most popular modern variant is plover[1]. However, it might be hard to transition to.

[1] http://plover.stenoknight.com/


Speaking of Plover and chorded keyboards, check out this open source stenotype machine:

http://stenosaurus.com

Chatter on the mailing list makes is sound like it will be coming out in October.


Chording keyboards are mentioned in the first sentence of the post.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: