Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | scrollop's commentslogin

Maybe they're using the free version...


Arena.ai has reviewed it using many tasks against SOTA models.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO2I3ueVQrk&lc=UgxRXtipA3QbA...

tldr; it's not as good as opus 5.5


If you'd like to see how it compares against other SOTA models-

https://youtu.be/NO2I3ueVQrk?is=OWezDVBL3l2EHMbR

Tldr; it's about as good as sol. Opus 5.5 is still generally the best though carbon can be very good.


"Most available treatments for depression assume the disorder is underpinned by anxiety. "

As a doctor I would say this is incorrect.


Perhaps he is busy, and this is a passion project.

As he says, he doesn't have much time to research the entire book.

You think he has "weeks" to write it up for others?

I imagine there are thousands of interesting projects people are doing solo and can't be bothered creating website to share with others for.

If AI can do this- fantastic! Let people moan if they can't see the positives of this. He's not trying to win an award or is paid to create a site for the public.


It's not a passion project if you make it with AI.

How far our standards have fallen if spending 5 minutes typing into a chatbox is "a passion project".

*

1 point by scrollop 0 minutes ago | parent | next | edit | delete [–]

"The problem with AI generated content is, it tells me you didn't care enough about the work to do it yourself."

It may be the translation, however, this project is a passion for him. I would guess the passion is the book itself, and though he wants to share his passion, I imagine creating the actual page for others is tedious compared to the work of discovering the book. I have had the same issue.

If an AI can save you time so you can continue with your passion, I say go for it. No one has paid you to create the page, he's not vying for an award. If people are interested they can read it.

There are likely many people out there doing remarkable work but they can't be bothered creating a website to share with others.

If AI can do that, fantastic - even though some people will moan. There are always people who complain.


It may be the translation, however, this project is a passion for him. I would guess the passion is the book itself, and though he wants to share his passion, I imagine creating the actual page for others is tedious compared to the work of discovering the book. I have had the same issue.

If an AI can save you time so you can continue with your passion, I say go for it. No one has paid you to create the page, he's not vying for an award. If people are interested they can read it.


Maybe he is translating to English. Maybe he is translating himself and this is an artifact of German.

"If an author doesn’t have time to write. Why should I give up my time to read?"

Perhaps he is taking the time to translate it for you, otherwise you'd have to do it yourself.


> and this is an artifact of German

It isn't.


You trust AA since the sol fiasco a month or two ago?


What did I miss?


They updated their methodology when the new openai model didn't rate higher than the old one, or something like that.


I do t think it was a fiasco. I thought the updates were good. They should do more work on benchmarks. There has been good work on testing benchmarks for example to ensure they are accurate, and as issues arise they should change the benchmarks. The point of AA and Arena is trying to understand how to think about models.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: