Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ssnri's commentslogin

10% is within 10x of all percentages, lol.


Well, except less than 1%... but perhaps that was delivered too dryly.


the fuckin regolith! It’s the worst. It will destroy anything you build. It’s like sand but every grain has been personally sharpened by the devil


That’s a lovely description of regolith. I’m stealing it :D

The moon is hostile to life on a level that humans can’t instinctively grasp. It’s a reminder of what a perfect cradle of life Earth is.


Perfect solution: have 10 kids and go to church every day.

Or get a hobby. Up to you


Unpopular opinion: parents get tax breaks, extra paid time off, and plenty of social leeway for blocking sidewalks with strollers / crying babies on planes, etc.

Please don’t ask for more. We who don’t have kids have our own problems.

As George Carlin put it: “speaking as a mother, …”


I just like nice computers and don’t really care about the inter-corporate mudslinging.

Now not paying an equal share of tax, on the other hand, is criticism I can join in on.


this is why i dislike refactoring unless there’s a legitimate change to the functionality and not just a rearrangement.

Leave the history alone for us bug spelunkers


The biggest problem I’ve run into in this respect is reformatting and behavior changes in the same commit. It’s not all that hard to trace back as long as nobody does this. It’s why I hate squashing.


You can squash commits with squashing unrelated commits.


Refactoring doesn’t lose history. Mass migrating between source control systems loses history


It makes that history harder to read. The same piece of logic can move across files and modules and functions over the years. While it's possible to go past each of them and trace that code past those moves, it takes time and effort to do so.


I’m normally the one doing that historical spelunking, so I’m also a fan of refactors or rewritten methods that reduce the need to go back and figure out why the code is there. But I’m usually also the one doing that: maybe if other people around me did more refactoring I’d start hating it too!


That just takes the argument from bad to worse. “How will I condescend to my users without breaking their browser functionality?”

Zero times have I been saved by this feature


> The popular "heart" is rather abstract and does not directly depict anything biological

Just gotta think lower down


Ah, seems I was thinking of category 1b. I’ll keep reading. Great find.


I would even let it have longer processing times for queries to apply against each document in my system, allow it to specialize/train itself on a daily basis…

Use all the resources you want if you save me brainpower


Agree, there's a non real-time angle to this.


"give me a summary of the news around this topic each morning for my daily read"

Help me plan for upcoming meetings whereby if I put something in calendar, it will build a little dossier for the event, and include relevant info based on the type of event or meeting, mostly scheduling reminders or prompting you with updates or changes to the event etc.


“filter out baby pictures from my family text threads”


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: